The result was keep. The consensus is that this campaign is notable. However, I don't see why this article couldn't be called Campaign against Highgate Rabbit Farm or something similar but that can be discussed on the article's talk page. Ron Ritzman ( talk) 00:49, 24 January 2011 (UTC) reply
A
WP:COATRACK for documenting a campaign of criminal activity. There is almost no information about the subject of the article itself, a small business (rabbit breeding) that made the mistake of selling rabbits for experimentation, but plenty about the attacks on it and other attacks by the same groups. The crimes themselves have been reported only in the very local press. Such articles offer little but to publicize the crime and have no encyclopaedic value on the nominal subject. At most, this deserves a line in the
ALF and/or
SHAC article. See also
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Regal Rabbits and
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Consort Kennels for other examples of similar articles, now deleted.
Rockpocke
t 18:52, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
reply
The result was keep. The consensus is that this campaign is notable. However, I don't see why this article couldn't be called Campaign against Highgate Rabbit Farm or something similar but that can be discussed on the article's talk page. Ron Ritzman ( talk) 00:49, 24 January 2011 (UTC) reply
A
WP:COATRACK for documenting a campaign of criminal activity. There is almost no information about the subject of the article itself, a small business (rabbit breeding) that made the mistake of selling rabbits for experimentation, but plenty about the attacks on it and other attacks by the same groups. The crimes themselves have been reported only in the very local press. Such articles offer little but to publicize the crime and have no encyclopaedic value on the nominal subject. At most, this deserves a line in the
ALF and/or
SHAC article. See also
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Regal Rabbits and
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Consort Kennels for other examples of similar articles, now deleted.
Rockpocke
t 18:52, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
reply