The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Comment - is there a policy on embassies? An embassy is not an organization, it's a place of residence and work for a head of state. It projects the authority and influence of that head of state into the surrounding area, and carries at least as much influence as any organization or person that reports to it. I would keep all of these. -
Richard Cavell (
talk)
08:44, 8 June 2017 (UTC)reply
as diplomatic missions they have no inherent notability as many have been d well deleted. If the building is proven notable then they may be notable.
LibStar (
talk)
00:33, 17 June 2017 (UTC)reply
None of them appear architecturally notable: as far as I can tell, they're either office suites in larger buildings or ordinary houses. --
Colapeninsula (
talk)
09:01, 23 June 2017 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Comment - is there a policy on embassies? An embassy is not an organization, it's a place of residence and work for a head of state. It projects the authority and influence of that head of state into the surrounding area, and carries at least as much influence as any organization or person that reports to it. I would keep all of these. -
Richard Cavell (
talk)
08:44, 8 June 2017 (UTC)reply
as diplomatic missions they have no inherent notability as many have been d well deleted. If the building is proven notable then they may be notable.
LibStar (
talk)
00:33, 17 June 2017 (UTC)reply
None of them appear architecturally notable: as far as I can tell, they're either office suites in larger buildings or ordinary houses. --
Colapeninsula (
talk)
09:01, 23 June 2017 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.