- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MelanieN ( talk) 00:45, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
HiTi Digital Inc.
- HiTi Digital Inc. ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:GNG WP:CORP and WP:CORPDEPTH Not much to the article other than PR speak, created and contributed to SPA/COI. Nothing significant in article (DIMA, where they got awards, does not seem a major award), nothing significant found in a google search Rayman60 ( talk) 22:21, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 16:30, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 16:30, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 16:30, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
- Delete as this another classic example of nothing actually being applicably better for the notability, there are sources but simply overall not convincing at all. SwisterTwister talk 20:47, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nakon 04:44, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nakon 04:44, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 15:56, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 15:56, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- Delete – Coverage available in searches is primarily about the company's printers. However, not finding much about the company itself. Posting sources found for others to peruse below. North America 1000 16:10, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
References
- Shutterbug
- PC Magazine
- The Savvy Guide to Digital Photography
- PC Magazine (subscription required)
- Delete. No evidence of notability. No sign of significant coverage in reliable sources. B E C K Y S A Y L E S 10:13, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MelanieN ( talk) 00:45, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
HiTi Digital Inc.
- HiTi Digital Inc. ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:GNG WP:CORP and WP:CORPDEPTH Not much to the article other than PR speak, created and contributed to SPA/COI. Nothing significant in article (DIMA, where they got awards, does not seem a major award), nothing significant found in a google search Rayman60 ( talk) 22:21, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 16:30, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 16:30, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 16:30, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
- Delete as this another classic example of nothing actually being applicably better for the notability, there are sources but simply overall not convincing at all. SwisterTwister talk 20:47, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nakon 04:44, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nakon 04:44, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 15:56, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 15:56, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- Delete – Coverage available in searches is primarily about the company's printers. However, not finding much about the company itself. Posting sources found for others to peruse below. North America 1000 16:10, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
References
- Shutterbug
- PC Magazine
- The Savvy Guide to Digital Photography
- PC Magazine (subscription required)
- Delete. No evidence of notability. No sign of significant coverage in reliable sources. B E C K Y S A Y L E S 10:13, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.