The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete.
Owen×☎ 14:02, 11 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Tone seems improved but there does not seem to be any ORGCRIT eligible sources since the previous AFD.
Alpha3031 (
t •
c) 13:08, 13 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Keep The previous version was deleted in 2020. This is quite a different from previous. I can see here significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources. And a listed company at
National Stock Exchange and
Bombay Stock Exchange.
MeltPees (
talk) 17:09, 14 May 2024 (UTC)reply
You know, if all you're going to do is past a few specific articles from draft to mainspace and then show up at several AFDs eventually you're going to attract scrutiny like an SPA.
Alpha3031 (
t •
c) 13:16, 15 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Blocked for spamming.
MER-C 09:52, 26 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete. Some sources are reliable but still do not help with notability, lack of significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Fails
WP:ORGCRIT. Wikipedia is not a business directory.
RangersRus (
talk) 13:59, 16 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
DoczillaOhhhhhh, no! 01:26, 21 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, LizRead!Talk! 02:18, 28 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Keep: The last AFD discussion was in February 2020 and since then the company received several articles and stories such as this article in Bloomberg
1, the Hindu articles
2,
3 and
4 (which is considered a reliable source per
WP:RSP), and
this article from Reuters. More citations might haven't included in the
2020 previous page version such as The Hindu article
5 and the Reuters article
5.
Rchardk (
talk) 15:26, 3 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Rchardk, reliable is fine and all, and if that were the only criteria it could have been kept even back in 2020, but there are three others. Can you take a look at the rules for trivial, especially
routine coverage or those for
independence and tell me which of the sources you posted meet those? They seem like the usual announcements copied from press releases.
Alpha3031 (
t •
c) 02:44, 4 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Final relist. Please assess new sources, Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, LizRead!Talk! 04:18, 4 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete: As per the
citeunseen script, this page has 11 reliable sources, but all of them are trivial, especially routine coverage, as Alpha3031 has rightly noticed. If there are any three
reliable sources, which satisfies
ORGCRIT, there's a possibility of keeping it; otherwise, it's a straight-forward delete.
Charlie (
talk) 05:38, 7 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete I'm unable to locate any reference that meet GNG/
WP:NCORP criteria for establishing notability.
HighKing++ 13:48, 11 June 2024 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete.
Owen×☎ 14:02, 11 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Tone seems improved but there does not seem to be any ORGCRIT eligible sources since the previous AFD.
Alpha3031 (
t •
c) 13:08, 13 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Keep The previous version was deleted in 2020. This is quite a different from previous. I can see here significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources. And a listed company at
National Stock Exchange and
Bombay Stock Exchange.
MeltPees (
talk) 17:09, 14 May 2024 (UTC)reply
You know, if all you're going to do is past a few specific articles from draft to mainspace and then show up at several AFDs eventually you're going to attract scrutiny like an SPA.
Alpha3031 (
t •
c) 13:16, 15 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Blocked for spamming.
MER-C 09:52, 26 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete. Some sources are reliable but still do not help with notability, lack of significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Fails
WP:ORGCRIT. Wikipedia is not a business directory.
RangersRus (
talk) 13:59, 16 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
DoczillaOhhhhhh, no! 01:26, 21 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, LizRead!Talk! 02:18, 28 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Keep: The last AFD discussion was in February 2020 and since then the company received several articles and stories such as this article in Bloomberg
1, the Hindu articles
2,
3 and
4 (which is considered a reliable source per
WP:RSP), and
this article from Reuters. More citations might haven't included in the
2020 previous page version such as The Hindu article
5 and the Reuters article
5.
Rchardk (
talk) 15:26, 3 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Rchardk, reliable is fine and all, and if that were the only criteria it could have been kept even back in 2020, but there are three others. Can you take a look at the rules for trivial, especially
routine coverage or those for
independence and tell me which of the sources you posted meet those? They seem like the usual announcements copied from press releases.
Alpha3031 (
t •
c) 02:44, 4 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Final relist. Please assess new sources, Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, LizRead!Talk! 04:18, 4 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete: As per the
citeunseen script, this page has 11 reliable sources, but all of them are trivial, especially routine coverage, as Alpha3031 has rightly noticed. If there are any three
reliable sources, which satisfies
ORGCRIT, there's a possibility of keeping it; otherwise, it's a straight-forward delete.
Charlie (
talk) 05:38, 7 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete I'm unable to locate any reference that meet GNG/
WP:NCORP criteria for establishing notability.
HighKing++ 13:48, 11 June 2024 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.