The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Fails
WP:GNG and
WP:GEOROAD, article does not have non-trivial coverage. Additionally, its content is limited to trivial information (such as parking shoulders) and an 'importance' section that contains things seem standard and non-notable for a road in a town of Hastings' size. User:Axisixa[talk][contribs]22:44, 27 June 2017 (UTC)reply
Keep First of all,
AfD is not clean up. Whether something is unreferenced or an article is poorly written is rather secondary to the issue of notability. Yes, an article should show notability, but if it doesn't, it does not necessarily mean that it's not notable. I hold
Grutness's essay "
One street per 50,000 people" in high regards. Going by that, Hastings should have articles for one or two of its streets. Which one or ones should it be? I very much suggest that it'll be Heretaunga Street. It's got the pedestrian mall (they aren't really that common in New Zealand). The centre of the town is the point where Heretaunga Street crosses the railway. It's got a number of heritage buildings on it that are registered by
Heritage New Zealand (still working on that table). To me, this is a keep, and we should collectively work on it to turn it into something better than the poor article that got nominated for deletion. I'm doing my bit. Maybe
the nominator,
Ajf773, and
MB should have another look when I've done more work on it. And join in! Schwede6605:06, 1 July 2017 (UTC)reply
Keep. The main street of one of New Zealand's main provincial urban areas, containing a goodly number of heritage buildings. Did the article nead cleanup? Yes - though Schwede66 has done good work to improve it. Does it need deletion? No. (PS - thanks for the kind words on my essay,
Schwede66).
Grutness...wha?02:02, 2 July 2017 (UTC)reply
Keep. As now notability has been established. It does have some POV/OR issues however that need to be addresses in cleanup.
Ajf773 (
talk)
08:35, 2 July 2017 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Fails
WP:GNG and
WP:GEOROAD, article does not have non-trivial coverage. Additionally, its content is limited to trivial information (such as parking shoulders) and an 'importance' section that contains things seem standard and non-notable for a road in a town of Hastings' size. User:Axisixa[talk][contribs]22:44, 27 June 2017 (UTC)reply
Keep First of all,
AfD is not clean up. Whether something is unreferenced or an article is poorly written is rather secondary to the issue of notability. Yes, an article should show notability, but if it doesn't, it does not necessarily mean that it's not notable. I hold
Grutness's essay "
One street per 50,000 people" in high regards. Going by that, Hastings should have articles for one or two of its streets. Which one or ones should it be? I very much suggest that it'll be Heretaunga Street. It's got the pedestrian mall (they aren't really that common in New Zealand). The centre of the town is the point where Heretaunga Street crosses the railway. It's got a number of heritage buildings on it that are registered by
Heritage New Zealand (still working on that table). To me, this is a keep, and we should collectively work on it to turn it into something better than the poor article that got nominated for deletion. I'm doing my bit. Maybe
the nominator,
Ajf773, and
MB should have another look when I've done more work on it. And join in! Schwede6605:06, 1 July 2017 (UTC)reply
Keep. The main street of one of New Zealand's main provincial urban areas, containing a goodly number of heritage buildings. Did the article nead cleanup? Yes - though Schwede66 has done good work to improve it. Does it need deletion? No. (PS - thanks for the kind words on my essay,
Schwede66).
Grutness...wha?02:02, 2 July 2017 (UTC)reply
Keep. As now notability has been established. It does have some POV/OR issues however that need to be addresses in cleanup.
Ajf773 (
talk)
08:35, 2 July 2017 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.