The result of the debate wasNo Consensus, Keep. Delete:11 Keep: 8 Deletion percentage of 58 percent. Not enough consensus. Ëvilphoenix Burn! 19:41, 19 March 2006 (UTC) reply
I have concerns about this article because it purports to be about a living person and a lot of unreferenced and unverifiable allegations are made. There is only one relevant Google hit, an archive of sex offenders which only states her name, age and sentence [1]. This site is the only online reference cited in the article. The rest of the Google hits appear to be about a West Wing character. There are also no hits for legal documents containing the name in any database on AustLii. [2] In addition to this, given the lack of online references, I question whether it meets notability standards. Sarah Ewart ( Talk) 12:32, 11 March 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate wasNo Consensus, Keep. Delete:11 Keep: 8 Deletion percentage of 58 percent. Not enough consensus. Ëvilphoenix Burn! 19:41, 19 March 2006 (UTC) reply
I have concerns about this article because it purports to be about a living person and a lot of unreferenced and unverifiable allegations are made. There is only one relevant Google hit, an archive of sex offenders which only states her name, age and sentence [1]. This site is the only online reference cited in the article. The rest of the Google hits appear to be about a West Wing character. There are also no hits for legal documents containing the name in any database on AustLii. [2] In addition to this, given the lack of online references, I question whether it meets notability standards. Sarah Ewart ( Talk) 12:32, 11 March 2006 (UTC) reply