The result was no consensus, default to keep. Clearly not a consensus to delete here, and additional sources provided by Cunard pushed the consensus closer to an outright keep. However there is arguably still some validity to the WP:NOTNEWS argument, and a merge was another possibility discussed, so "no consensus" seems to be the correct close. Editors interested in a possible merge should discuss it on the article talk page. -- Bigtimepeace | talk | contribs 05:27, 26 January 2010 (UTC) reply
Notability for inclusion into a encyclopaedia of this dog/company/product is questionable. NJA (t/ c) 13:51, 18 January 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus, default to keep. Clearly not a consensus to delete here, and additional sources provided by Cunard pushed the consensus closer to an outright keep. However there is arguably still some validity to the WP:NOTNEWS argument, and a merge was another possibility discussed, so "no consensus" seems to be the correct close. Editors interested in a possible merge should discuss it on the article talk page. -- Bigtimepeace | talk | contribs 05:27, 26 January 2010 (UTC) reply
Notability for inclusion into a encyclopaedia of this dog/company/product is questionable. NJA (t/ c) 13:51, 18 January 2010 (UTC) reply