The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
There is a split discussion on the talk page, and there appear to be two separate articles for Headland and Bay now. This article just serves to confuse (and attract vandals, by the look of the recent history!). I have not yet had time to check that all info is in the respective separate articles, but once this is done I think this one should be deleted.
Laterthanyouthink (
talk) 01:23, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
p.s. Having just scrolled down a bit in the Headland article, I see that much of it is a list. This probably needs to be split off into a separate list article?
Laterthanyouthink (
talk)
01:28, 6 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Keep A bay is naturally bounded by headlands and so these forms are commonly associated – see
BBC, for example. If material is split/merged, we should still retain the edit history for attribution and reference.
AfD is not cleanupAndrew🐉(
talk)
09:01, 6 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete/merge Nothing in this article gives any indication why this is a distinctly notable topic from
bay and
headland. Content about beaches has little to do with a link between bays and headlands and the article reads as synthesis.
Reywas92Talk05:56, 8 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete, as seperate articles for
headland and
bay exist, this article serves no purpose, and it fails
WP:SYNTH anyway. There is no primary target to redirect to, and so merging any content would be a copyright violation, so deleting it is the best option.
Devonian Wombat (
talk)
07:16, 8 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Either delete, or selective merge, then redirect to
Coast. This looks like an unnecessary sub-summary of material covered elsewhere. Section "Beach stability" is entirely covered at
Beach evolution. A sentence or two from section "Geology and geography" can go to enhance the overview at
Coast#Formation, but it's nothing that couldn't just be added de novo, so if the redirect is not desired, delete should be fine. --Elmidae (
talk ·
contribs)
16:45, 10 October 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
There is a split discussion on the talk page, and there appear to be two separate articles for Headland and Bay now. This article just serves to confuse (and attract vandals, by the look of the recent history!). I have not yet had time to check that all info is in the respective separate articles, but once this is done I think this one should be deleted.
Laterthanyouthink (
talk) 01:23, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
p.s. Having just scrolled down a bit in the Headland article, I see that much of it is a list. This probably needs to be split off into a separate list article?
Laterthanyouthink (
talk)
01:28, 6 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Keep A bay is naturally bounded by headlands and so these forms are commonly associated – see
BBC, for example. If material is split/merged, we should still retain the edit history for attribution and reference.
AfD is not cleanupAndrew🐉(
talk)
09:01, 6 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete/merge Nothing in this article gives any indication why this is a distinctly notable topic from
bay and
headland. Content about beaches has little to do with a link between bays and headlands and the article reads as synthesis.
Reywas92Talk05:56, 8 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete, as seperate articles for
headland and
bay exist, this article serves no purpose, and it fails
WP:SYNTH anyway. There is no primary target to redirect to, and so merging any content would be a copyright violation, so deleting it is the best option.
Devonian Wombat (
talk)
07:16, 8 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Either delete, or selective merge, then redirect to
Coast. This looks like an unnecessary sub-summary of material covered elsewhere. Section "Beach stability" is entirely covered at
Beach evolution. A sentence or two from section "Geology and geography" can go to enhance the overview at
Coast#Formation, but it's nothing that couldn't just be added de novo, so if the redirect is not desired, delete should be fine. --Elmidae (
talk ·
contribs)
16:45, 10 October 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.