The result was no consensus. v/r - T P 03:40, 12 September 2011 (UTC) reply
Prodded, prod removed. There is no supporting article for the band, no references Richhoncho ( talk) 19:51, 29 July 2011 (UTC) reply
That being said, perhaps you should reread A9, which holds, "An article about a musical recording that does not indicate why its subject is important or significant and where the artist's article does not exist (both conditions must be true)." (emphasis in the original) I rather expect that most editors, myself included, would view a mention that a song had twice over made the top 40 of a national singles' chart as a valid assertion of significance. Cheers back atcha. ῲ Ravenswing ῴ 12:43, 6 September 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus. v/r - T P 03:40, 12 September 2011 (UTC) reply
Prodded, prod removed. There is no supporting article for the band, no references Richhoncho ( talk) 19:51, 29 July 2011 (UTC) reply
That being said, perhaps you should reread A9, which holds, "An article about a musical recording that does not indicate why its subject is important or significant and where the artist's article does not exist (both conditions must be true)." (emphasis in the original) I rather expect that most editors, myself included, would view a mention that a song had twice over made the top 40 of a national singles' chart as a valid assertion of significance. Cheers back atcha. ῲ Ravenswing ῴ 12:43, 6 September 2011 (UTC) reply