The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete.
Mkdwtalk 21:54, 16 December 2015 (UTC)reply
Non-notable martial artist. Coverage is from primary sources so
WP:GNG is not met and I don't see anything to shows he meets
WP:MANOTE.
Mdtemp (
talk) 15:55, 27 November 2015 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:43, 4 December 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete I could not find significant independent coverage to show that he meets either
WP:GNG or
WP:MANOTE. Nothing in the article or its sources supports a claim of notability.
Papaursa (
talk) 03:17, 9 December 2015 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kharkiv07 (
T) 03:56, 11 December 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete. No evidence of in-depth coverage in third-party sources, so
WP:GNG requirements are not satisfied. --
DAJF (
talk) 09:16, 12 December 2015 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete.
Mkdwtalk 21:54, 16 December 2015 (UTC)reply
Non-notable martial artist. Coverage is from primary sources so
WP:GNG is not met and I don't see anything to shows he meets
WP:MANOTE.
Mdtemp (
talk) 15:55, 27 November 2015 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:43, 4 December 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete I could not find significant independent coverage to show that he meets either
WP:GNG or
WP:MANOTE. Nothing in the article or its sources supports a claim of notability.
Papaursa (
talk) 03:17, 9 December 2015 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kharkiv07 (
T) 03:56, 11 December 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete. No evidence of in-depth coverage in third-party sources, so
WP:GNG requirements are not satisfied. --
DAJF (
talk) 09:16, 12 December 2015 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.