The result was delete. -- Cirt ( talk) 05:04, 15 May 2011 (UTC) reply
This is a problematic article that has no citations and a complete lack of notability. It was only reinstated after an initial suggest for deletion due to the subject contesting that it was still valid on the grounds of it having been around for five years. The fact that it has been around in this state for so long and the fact that the subject had to resuscitate it would all lead credence to the argument that it is not notable and continues to be an unverified, personal page for one writer in San Francisco of which there are thousands of equal status. Allowing this article to stay sets the precedent for countless others to be created. Primecoordinator ( talk) 03:46, 7 May 2011 (UTC) Primecoordinator ( talk) 04:45, 07 May 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. -- Cirt ( talk) 05:04, 15 May 2011 (UTC) reply
This is a problematic article that has no citations and a complete lack of notability. It was only reinstated after an initial suggest for deletion due to the subject contesting that it was still valid on the grounds of it having been around for five years. The fact that it has been around in this state for so long and the fact that the subject had to resuscitate it would all lead credence to the argument that it is not notable and continues to be an unverified, personal page for one writer in San Francisco of which there are thousands of equal status. Allowing this article to stay sets the precedent for countless others to be created. Primecoordinator ( talk) 03:46, 7 May 2011 (UTC) Primecoordinator ( talk) 04:45, 07 May 2011 (UTC) reply