The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete: My searches find various routine announcements and a passing mention in a trade publication article
Specialty Coffee Retailer – via
HighBeam(subscription required) : enough to verify this as a company going about its business but nothing indicating
encyclopaedic notability. However Japanese sources may have better: I have notified the Japan project and am happy to revise my opinion if they locate better .
AllyD (
talk)
11:26, 9 December 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete and Salt given this has not only been deleted in 2008, but was also in 2014, so the fact it's here yet again only suggests blatancy at restarting it later, since it would make it the 4th attempt. Although its local billion income is significant enough to not speedy, there's still not the currently needed substance.
SwisterTwistertalk05:10, 14 December 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete: My searches find various routine announcements and a passing mention in a trade publication article
Specialty Coffee Retailer – via
HighBeam(subscription required) : enough to verify this as a company going about its business but nothing indicating
encyclopaedic notability. However Japanese sources may have better: I have notified the Japan project and am happy to revise my opinion if they locate better .
AllyD (
talk)
11:26, 9 December 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete and Salt given this has not only been deleted in 2008, but was also in 2014, so the fact it's here yet again only suggests blatancy at restarting it later, since it would make it the 4th attempt. Although its local billion income is significant enough to not speedy, there's still not the currently needed substance.
SwisterTwistertalk05:10, 14 December 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.