- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. ( WP:NPASR.) (Non-administrator closure.) Northamerica1000 (talk) 05:36, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
- Hanne & Co ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not notable. Reported cases should probably be credited to the relevant Barristers not to the instructing firm of Solicitors. Article is basically an advert. Philafrenzy ( talk) 23:48, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 02:24, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 02:24, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 02:24, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
- Weak keep per WP:AGF. Older firms (those more than 100 years old) usually pass my standards for law firms. I'd like more information and to see more reliable sources with significant coverage before I could be certain of general notability. Bearian ( talk) 20:27, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
-
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Michaelzeng7 ( talk) 21:17, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
-
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Northamerica1000 (talk) 08:52, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. ( WP:NPASR.) (Non-administrator closure.) Northamerica1000 (talk) 05:36, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
- Hanne & Co ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not notable. Reported cases should probably be credited to the relevant Barristers not to the instructing firm of Solicitors. Article is basically an advert. Philafrenzy ( talk) 23:48, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 02:24, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 02:24, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 02:24, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
- Weak keep per WP:AGF. Older firms (those more than 100 years old) usually pass my standards for law firms. I'd like more information and to see more reliable sources with significant coverage before I could be certain of general notability. Bearian ( talk) 20:27, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
-
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Michaelzeng7 ( talk) 21:17, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
-
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Northamerica1000 (talk) 08:52, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.