The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete per lack of sources
Corpx 06:08, 11 August 2007 (UTC)reply
Delete. If she is only popular on social networking sites then she's utterly non-notable.
JIP |
Talk 07:49, 12 August 2007 (UTC)reply
Delete, no notability established.
Corvus cornix 18:39, 14 August 2007 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete per lack of sources
Corpx 06:08, 11 August 2007 (UTC)reply
Delete. If she is only popular on social networking sites then she's utterly non-notable.
JIP |
Talk 07:49, 12 August 2007 (UTC)reply
Delete, no notability established.
Corvus cornix 18:39, 14 August 2007 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.