The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Other than an imdb link (which means nothing towards notability), this article is devoid of any sources to establish how this individual meets
WP:BIO notability criteria. OhNoitsJamieTalk17:32, 7 March 2014 (UTC)reply
Weak delete: The article did include sources at one point of time, which the user wich included them removed again, but however the perosn doesn't appear to be notable enough for a Wikipedia-entry. (
t)
Josve05a (
c)20:50, 7 March 2014 (UTC)reply
Comment While I agree that the current article is a mess, shouldn't we give
Yunshui a little more than five hours to improve it before nominating it again?
Huon (
talk)
21:34, 7 March 2014 (UTC)reply
Sorry, i did not see that but since i saw it on nominations and evaluated the page and the subject and already came to an opinion so won't change my vote, Thanks
Sajjad Altaf (
talk)
21:36, 7 March 2014 (UTC)reply
I already tried improving it, but the article's creator persistently reverted the sourced material I added. I've got better things to do with my time. It's borderline anyway; I'd say Weak delete based on
WP:BLP1E - he's only notable for his 2005 arrest and detention, not for any of his films or writings.
Yunshui雲
水22:24, 7 March 2014 (UTC)reply
Comment The article now includes footnotes but one is from Wordpress, one from IMDb and one in just a scanned copy of a novel written by the person. Those do not count as reliable sources. (
t)
Josve05a (
c)12:01, 8 March 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Other than an imdb link (which means nothing towards notability), this article is devoid of any sources to establish how this individual meets
WP:BIO notability criteria. OhNoitsJamieTalk17:32, 7 March 2014 (UTC)reply
Weak delete: The article did include sources at one point of time, which the user wich included them removed again, but however the perosn doesn't appear to be notable enough for a Wikipedia-entry. (
t)
Josve05a (
c)20:50, 7 March 2014 (UTC)reply
Comment While I agree that the current article is a mess, shouldn't we give
Yunshui a little more than five hours to improve it before nominating it again?
Huon (
talk)
21:34, 7 March 2014 (UTC)reply
Sorry, i did not see that but since i saw it on nominations and evaluated the page and the subject and already came to an opinion so won't change my vote, Thanks
Sajjad Altaf (
talk)
21:36, 7 March 2014 (UTC)reply
I already tried improving it, but the article's creator persistently reverted the sourced material I added. I've got better things to do with my time. It's borderline anyway; I'd say Weak delete based on
WP:BLP1E - he's only notable for his 2005 arrest and detention, not for any of his films or writings.
Yunshui雲
水22:24, 7 March 2014 (UTC)reply
Comment The article now includes footnotes but one is from Wordpress, one from IMDb and one in just a scanned copy of a novel written by the person. Those do not count as reliable sources. (
t)
Josve05a (
c)12:01, 8 March 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.