The result was Keep per WP:SNOW. Non-admin closure. Pastor Theo ( talk) 02:01, 3 February 2009 (UTC) reply
Procedural nomination. Was recently listed as a good article, but there's been some discussion as to whether the topic is notable for a stand alone article. I cast no !vote at the present time, but I'm leaning towards keep. Sarcasticidealist ( talk) 14:45, 2 February 2009 (UTC) reply
(Also, the reviewer made clear the promotion to GA was under protest.) There is difference between laying out theories, that were developed based on analysis of data and put forth by academics/experts, and perhaps contrasting one academic theory to another's, versus, a list of academic's guesses who - seemingly - made the capital mistake of theorizing before one has data. Most content is already in Hamlet#Sources. We don't even know when he was born (not baptised), or what he died of. Merging useful content followed by suitable redirecting, complying with WP:PRESERVE, seems sensible. Whitehorse1 18:13, 2 February 2009 (UTC) reply
That proves nothing about the birth or parentage of Hamnet Shakespeare. I removed it but the editor put it back. — Mattisse ( Talk) 01:47, 3 February 2009 (UTC) replyWitness to the publishing hereof: Fra: Collyns, Juilyus Shawe, John Robinson, Hamnet Sadler, robert Whattcott.
The result was Keep per WP:SNOW. Non-admin closure. Pastor Theo ( talk) 02:01, 3 February 2009 (UTC) reply
Procedural nomination. Was recently listed as a good article, but there's been some discussion as to whether the topic is notable for a stand alone article. I cast no !vote at the present time, but I'm leaning towards keep. Sarcasticidealist ( talk) 14:45, 2 February 2009 (UTC) reply
(Also, the reviewer made clear the promotion to GA was under protest.) There is difference between laying out theories, that were developed based on analysis of data and put forth by academics/experts, and perhaps contrasting one academic theory to another's, versus, a list of academic's guesses who - seemingly - made the capital mistake of theorizing before one has data. Most content is already in Hamlet#Sources. We don't even know when he was born (not baptised), or what he died of. Merging useful content followed by suitable redirecting, complying with WP:PRESERVE, seems sensible. Whitehorse1 18:13, 2 February 2009 (UTC) reply
That proves nothing about the birth or parentage of Hamnet Shakespeare. I removed it but the editor put it back. — Mattisse ( Talk) 01:47, 3 February 2009 (UTC) replyWitness to the publishing hereof: Fra: Collyns, Juilyus Shawe, John Robinson, Hamnet Sadler, robert Whattcott.