The result was no consensus. North America 1000 02:34, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
The subject does not meet the notability guidelines established by Wikipedia. The organization, although potentially important in its niche, does not have significant coverage in independent, reliable sources that would justify its existence as a standalone Wikipedia article.
The references provided within the article are few in number and insufficient to establish notability. The majority of the citations stem from the organization's own materials or affiliated promotional sources, which do not adhere to Wikipedia's requirement for neutral, third-party coverage. The scarcity of verifiable, independent sources raises concerns about the organization's impact and relevance in the broader context. Lulakayd ( talk) 13:15, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previous
WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
14:51, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
23:42, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:59, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. North America 1000 02:34, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
The subject does not meet the notability guidelines established by Wikipedia. The organization, although potentially important in its niche, does not have significant coverage in independent, reliable sources that would justify its existence as a standalone Wikipedia article.
The references provided within the article are few in number and insufficient to establish notability. The majority of the citations stem from the organization's own materials or affiliated promotional sources, which do not adhere to Wikipedia's requirement for neutral, third-party coverage. The scarcity of verifiable, independent sources raises concerns about the organization's impact and relevance in the broader context. Lulakayd ( talk) 13:15, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previous
WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
14:51, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
23:42, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:59, 29 May 2023 (UTC)