The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Just another website with 1 reference being a listing where everyone can add their company. CSD was declined. This search engine is not anything special. »
Shadowowl |
talk12:49, 17 July 2018 (UTC)reply
Keep. I'm not an expert or anything, but it seems Hakia was one of the pioneers of
semantic search and
natural-language searchat a time when Google and others cared more about keywords and less about context. Some coverage I found on a short GBooks/GNews/Highbeam search:
O'Leary, Mick (2010-06-01).
"Hakia Gets Serious with Semantic Search". Information Today – via Highbeam. hakia's search interface is a single search panel with no on-screen search prompts and no advanced search options. Terms, phrases, and even lengthy text sections can be searched. However, there is no bound phrase searching.
"Now, computers that can also crack jokes". Hindustan Times. 2007-08-29 – via Highbeam. Hakia conducts searches based on meaning, instead of popularity of key words or phrases. However, more popular approaches rely on statistics, which analyzes millions of words in a text and looks at what words occur frequently around other words.
Madhu, G.; Govardhan, Dr A.; Rajinikanth, Dr T. V. (2011). "Intelligent Semantic Web Search Engines: A Brief Survey". International Journal of Web & Semantic Technology. 2 (1).
arXiv:1102.0831.
Jordan, Jay (2010-12-30). "Climbing Out of the Box and Into the Cloud: Building Web-Scale for Libraries". Journal of Library Administration. 51 (1): 3–17.
doi:
10.1080/01930826.2011.531637.
ISSN0193-0826.
Some of those are behind paywalls, so someone with access might have to check but it seems this search engine was a topic of scholarly discussion 10 years back. Regards
SoWhy13:12, 17 July 2018 (UTC)reply
Keep This is a site that generated significant press at the time. The fact that it's now lost to history doesn't make it unencyclopedic, we just have to avoid puffery.
Stuartyeates (
talk)
20:28, 17 July 2018 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Just another website with 1 reference being a listing where everyone can add their company. CSD was declined. This search engine is not anything special. »
Shadowowl |
talk12:49, 17 July 2018 (UTC)reply
Keep. I'm not an expert or anything, but it seems Hakia was one of the pioneers of
semantic search and
natural-language searchat a time when Google and others cared more about keywords and less about context. Some coverage I found on a short GBooks/GNews/Highbeam search:
O'Leary, Mick (2010-06-01).
"Hakia Gets Serious with Semantic Search". Information Today – via Highbeam. hakia's search interface is a single search panel with no on-screen search prompts and no advanced search options. Terms, phrases, and even lengthy text sections can be searched. However, there is no bound phrase searching.
"Now, computers that can also crack jokes". Hindustan Times. 2007-08-29 – via Highbeam. Hakia conducts searches based on meaning, instead of popularity of key words or phrases. However, more popular approaches rely on statistics, which analyzes millions of words in a text and looks at what words occur frequently around other words.
Madhu, G.; Govardhan, Dr A.; Rajinikanth, Dr T. V. (2011). "Intelligent Semantic Web Search Engines: A Brief Survey". International Journal of Web & Semantic Technology. 2 (1).
arXiv:1102.0831.
Jordan, Jay (2010-12-30). "Climbing Out of the Box and Into the Cloud: Building Web-Scale for Libraries". Journal of Library Administration. 51 (1): 3–17.
doi:
10.1080/01930826.2011.531637.
ISSN0193-0826.
Some of those are behind paywalls, so someone with access might have to check but it seems this search engine was a topic of scholarly discussion 10 years back. Regards
SoWhy13:12, 17 July 2018 (UTC)reply
Keep This is a site that generated significant press at the time. The fact that it's now lost to history doesn't make it unencyclopedic, we just have to avoid puffery.
Stuartyeates (
talk)
20:28, 17 July 2018 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.