The result was no consensus. MBisanz talk 00:03, 2 April 2009 (UTC) reply
This poorly written essay appears to be a soapbox for the creating editor's own political views, but the main problem with the article is that the laying-off of temporary workers is not a uniquely Japanese phenomenon, and there is thus no need to have a special article dedicated to the Japanese term for this practice. DAJF ( talk) 08:15, 18 March 2009 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus. MBisanz talk 00:03, 2 April 2009 (UTC) reply
This poorly written essay appears to be a soapbox for the creating editor's own political views, but the main problem with the article is that the laying-off of temporary workers is not a uniquely Japanese phenomenon, and there is thus no need to have a special article dedicated to the Japanese term for this practice. DAJF ( talk) 08:15, 18 March 2009 (UTC) reply