- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 04:42, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
Hades 2
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Hades 2 ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:NVG/ WP:GNG. The only RS-close article I found is the Nonada piece already used in the article. However, even that one only mentions the game in passing. Note that this discussion is about the 1999 Brazilian FPS, not the upcoming sequel to Hades. IceWelder [ ✉] 11:11, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. IceWelder [ ✉] 11:11, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
- Comment I found this and this, but WP:INDISCRIMINATE is far from being passed. Still, there is probably coverage out there in WP:OFFLINE sources. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ) 23:33, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:38, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eddie891 Talk Work 15:22, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
- Delete - Fails WP:N. None of the sources in the article are in-depth coverage from WP:RS. Actually, two of them are primary, and the other two are not even about the game itself. It seems a case of WP:SOAPBOX to me. In the pt.WP, the article was deleted three yrs ago.-- Kacamata! Dimmi!!! 22:14, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Sources are too few to satisfy WP:GNG. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ) 09:33, 10 September 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 04:42, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
Hades 2
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Hades 2 ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:NVG/ WP:GNG. The only RS-close article I found is the Nonada piece already used in the article. However, even that one only mentions the game in passing. Note that this discussion is about the 1999 Brazilian FPS, not the upcoming sequel to Hades. IceWelder [ ✉] 11:11, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. IceWelder [ ✉] 11:11, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
- Comment I found this and this, but WP:INDISCRIMINATE is far from being passed. Still, there is probably coverage out there in WP:OFFLINE sources. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ) 23:33, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:38, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eddie891 Talk Work 15:22, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
- Delete - Fails WP:N. None of the sources in the article are in-depth coverage from WP:RS. Actually, two of them are primary, and the other two are not even about the game itself. It seems a case of WP:SOAPBOX to me. In the pt.WP, the article was deleted three yrs ago.-- Kacamata! Dimmi!!! 22:14, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Sources are too few to satisfy WP:GNG. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ) 09:33, 10 September 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.