The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete. G11, a clear case of blatant advertising, it was admitted by the creator. Wikipedia is not a webhost to store information about your personal film project.
Mgm|
(talk) 23:59, 5 December 2008 (UTC)reply
Made up character, author has asked that it is kept until they finish a movie they are making
[1], however wikipedia is not a webhost provider nor a soapbox to advertise from
Terrillja talk 16:54, 5 December 2008 (UTC)reply
Speedy delete Author's message very clearly indicates that they are attempting to use Wikipedia as an advertising mechanism. No reason to give this a full five days (or even another five minutes, in my opinion).
Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 17:02, 5 December 2008 (UTC)reply
Strong delete, possibly speedily as nonsense, or under
WP:SNOWBALL. Why should the criteria prevent us getting rid of such rubbish?
TrulyBlue (
talk) 20:13, 5 December 2008 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete. G11, a clear case of blatant advertising, it was admitted by the creator. Wikipedia is not a webhost to store information about your personal film project.
Mgm|
(talk) 23:59, 5 December 2008 (UTC)reply
Made up character, author has asked that it is kept until they finish a movie they are making
[1], however wikipedia is not a webhost provider nor a soapbox to advertise from
Terrillja talk 16:54, 5 December 2008 (UTC)reply
Speedy delete Author's message very clearly indicates that they are attempting to use Wikipedia as an advertising mechanism. No reason to give this a full five days (or even another five minutes, in my opinion).
Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 17:02, 5 December 2008 (UTC)reply
Strong delete, possibly speedily as nonsense, or under
WP:SNOWBALL. Why should the criteria prevent us getting rid of such rubbish?
TrulyBlue (
talk) 20:13, 5 December 2008 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.