The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep per the
added sources by Jakew. Non-admin closure; I believe the article would not have been listed for deletion if it originally looked the way it looks now.
ShalomHello 17:11, 15 August 2007 (UTC)reply
I'm not comfortable speedy deleting this (as the government work is an assertion of notability), but this thing has no sources, failing WP:V badly. Delete.
Xoloz 20:04, 9 August 2007 (UTC)reply
Keep but source. The NOAA supercomputer (named Jet) is somewhat notable and the project has received
coverage. I don't think the other things are particularly notable or interesting, though. --
Dhartung |
Talk 20:54, 9 August 2007 (UTC)reply
FYI, we have an
image of the computer but no article for it specifically. --
Dhartung |
Talk 20:55, 9 August 2007 (UTC)reply
Keep, though some sourcing & editing is needed. I've added a couple of sources, as a start.
Jakew 21:17, 9 August 2007 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep per the
added sources by Jakew. Non-admin closure; I believe the article would not have been listed for deletion if it originally looked the way it looks now.
ShalomHello 17:11, 15 August 2007 (UTC)reply
I'm not comfortable speedy deleting this (as the government work is an assertion of notability), but this thing has no sources, failing WP:V badly. Delete.
Xoloz 20:04, 9 August 2007 (UTC)reply
Keep but source. The NOAA supercomputer (named Jet) is somewhat notable and the project has received
coverage. I don't think the other things are particularly notable or interesting, though. --
Dhartung |
Talk 20:54, 9 August 2007 (UTC)reply
FYI, we have an
image of the computer but no article for it specifically. --
Dhartung |
Talk 20:55, 9 August 2007 (UTC)reply
Keep, though some sourcing & editing is needed. I've added a couple of sources, as a start.
Jakew 21:17, 9 August 2007 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.