- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to List of stars in Ophiuchus. The Bushranger One ping only 09:37, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
HD 160346
- HD 160346 ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Doesn't seem to meet WP:NASTRO. Although there are some papers, all of them only mention the star tangentially, and don't actually do an in-depth study on it. Not visible to the naked eye. StringTheory11 ( t • c) 18:31, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
- I assume you mean to List of stars in Ophiuchus as the target. StringTheory11( t • c) 18:37, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
-
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Northamerica1000 (talk) 15:23, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 16:19, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to List of stars in Ophiuchus. The Bushranger One ping only 09:37, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
HD 160346
- HD 160346 ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Doesn't seem to meet WP:NASTRO. Although there are some papers, all of them only mention the star tangentially, and don't actually do an in-depth study on it. Not visible to the naked eye. StringTheory11 ( t • c) 18:31, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
- I assume you mean to List of stars in Ophiuchus as the target. StringTheory11( t • c) 18:37, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
-
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Northamerica1000 (talk) 15:23, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 16:19, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.