From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. None of the "keep" !votes rises above WP:ILIKEIT or is even remotely policy based. The appearance of several new SPA accounts raises suspicions of (meat)puppetry. Randykitty ( talk) 13:51, 7 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Hưng Thịnh Corporation

Hưng Thịnh Corporation (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Recently deleted under G11. Fails WP:NCORP. Still a piece of advertisement. DMySon ( talk) 03:43, 15 November 2021 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 13:08, 22 November 2021 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Bungle ( talkcontribs) 19:32, 29 November 2021 (UTC) reply

  • Keep - As Hoangnam4487 has said. One more thing about this subject that I’d like to mention is the fact that its brand name (Hưng Thịnh) – as mentioned in the “Scandals” section – has been copied by many other local organizations. Hence, when you search for information about it, you are likely to find many “fake” websites, which may make it difficult to determine reliability. As a Vietnamese resident, I’d like to keep the article as a source for users to know which organization is the real Hưng Thịnh – this, I believe, may help prevent further crises and riots like the one that happened in Long An in 2020. Dangkhoa275 ( talk) 06:13, 1 December 2021 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. None of the "keep" !votes rises above WP:ILIKEIT or is even remotely policy based. The appearance of several new SPA accounts raises suspicions of (meat)puppetry. Randykitty ( talk) 13:51, 7 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Hưng Thịnh Corporation

Hưng Thịnh Corporation (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Recently deleted under G11. Fails WP:NCORP. Still a piece of advertisement. DMySon ( talk) 03:43, 15 November 2021 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 13:08, 22 November 2021 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Bungle ( talkcontribs) 19:32, 29 November 2021 (UTC) reply

  • Keep - As Hoangnam4487 has said. One more thing about this subject that I’d like to mention is the fact that its brand name (Hưng Thịnh) – as mentioned in the “Scandals” section – has been copied by many other local organizations. Hence, when you search for information about it, you are likely to find many “fake” websites, which may make it difficult to determine reliability. As a Vietnamese resident, I’d like to keep the article as a source for users to know which organization is the real Hưng Thịnh – this, I believe, may help prevent further crises and riots like the one that happened in Long An in 2020. Dangkhoa275 ( talk) 06:13, 1 December 2021 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook