The result was delete. 78.26 ( spin me / revolutions) 18:23, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
Not a suitable topic for an encyclopedia. Simply being in the Guinness Book of World Records is not a claim of notability, and the references are all to that book. power~enwiki ( π, ν) 16:51, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
Non-encyclopedic cross-categorizations, such as "people from ethnic / cultural / religious group X employed by organization Y" or "restaurants specializing in food type X in city Y". Cross-categories such as these are not considered a sufficient basis for creating an article, unless the intersection of those categories is in some way a culturally significant phenomenon.. I don't think we need any articles of the form "Guinness World Record holders from X country". Colin M ( talk) 21:53, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. 78.26 ( spin me / revolutions) 18:23, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
Not a suitable topic for an encyclopedia. Simply being in the Guinness Book of World Records is not a claim of notability, and the references are all to that book. power~enwiki ( π, ν) 16:51, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
Non-encyclopedic cross-categorizations, such as "people from ethnic / cultural / religious group X employed by organization Y" or "restaurants specializing in food type X in city Y". Cross-categories such as these are not considered a sufficient basis for creating an article, unless the intersection of those categories is in some way a culturally significant phenomenon.. I don't think we need any articles of the form "Guinness World Record holders from X country". Colin M ( talk) 21:53, 19 February 2019 (UTC)