The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Possible rename or merge can be discussed on the article talk page. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:09, 3 June 2024 (UTC) reply

Grossology (books) (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable book series. Insufficient sourcing for 15 years, no independent sigcov provided to establish notability. PROD removed due to talkpage message from anon who "loved the books as a kid". Jdcooper ( talk) 01:11, 27 May 2024 (UTC) reply

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Literature, Video games, Biology, Medicine, and United States of America. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:10, 27 May 2024 (UTC) reply
• Keep: The anon was right. Grossology was an incredibly popular book series that spawned a TV show and a traveling museum exhibit, and I can find tons of newspaper articles about it. Here's a few: " Teaching the oozy gooey science of grossness" (Allentown Morning Call, Aug 2013), " Museum exhibit uncovers all things gross" (Lincoln Journal Star, Sept 2005), " Totally Gross" (Louisville Courier Journal, Feb 2007). Keep the article per WP:NEXIST. Toughpigs ( talk) 05:38, 27 May 2024 (UTC) reply
• Keep And move to Grossology as the primary topic per Toughpigs and the reliable sources he has found. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ) 08:17, 27 May 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Comment, these sources seem to refer to the exhibition, so I'm not sure they establish the books as the primary topic. The article about the TV series is far longer (though with a large amount of unsourced excess trivia). Maybe all the articles (+ info on the exhibition from the sources) should be merged into one. Jdcooper ( talk) 10:29, 28 May 2024 (UTC) reply

    I'll start one big page to see how a merge would work out at User:Jellyfish/Grossology and see how it looks all together. Will edit when time allows. Jellyfish (mobile) ( talk) 18:30, 28 May 2024 (UTC) reply

    On second thought - Grossology (TV series) is absolutely massive, at least on my phone. Unless there's a significant bit of fat to trim off the article, I think it'd be best left as a summary with the main article template thrown on top of the section. Jellyfish (mobile) ( talk) 18:40, 28 May 2024 (UTC) reply

    • I removed the worst of the fancruft, but yeah it's still a large article in its own right, so I agree with you. Jdcooper ( talk) 13:46, 29 May 2024 (UTC) reply

      Also just realized it has one incredibly nonspecific and presumably un-archived source. Lovely! Jellyfish (mobile) ( talk) 04:44, 30 May 2024 (UTC) reply

• Keep - traveling museum exhibit appears notable and has received nationwide coverage (albeit, from multiple local newspapers) from about 2007 to 2021. I also tracked down this NYT article, though it looks to just be a passing mention of the book. jellyfish  ✉ 19:00, 27 May 2024 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.