- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. § FreeRangeFrog croak 04:25, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Grenk
- Grenk ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unremarkable ink vendor. Other than a few press releases, I couldn't find any major news reports or similar stuff to establish its notability. Furthermore, a Google search reveals that the subject has been spamvertised on various websites in an attempt to gain traction on the web. Blake Gripling ( talk) 05:57, 10 November 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 15:33, 10 November 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 15:33, 10 November 2014 (UTC)
- Delete, Non notable vendor wothout any verified claims. Shashanksinghvi334 ( talk) 04:13, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
- Delete I don't know what an ink vendor would need to do to be notable, but this one exhibits no notability at all. LaMona ( talk) 23:32, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. § FreeRangeFrog croak 04:25, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Grenk
- Grenk ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unremarkable ink vendor. Other than a few press releases, I couldn't find any major news reports or similar stuff to establish its notability. Furthermore, a Google search reveals that the subject has been spamvertised on various websites in an attempt to gain traction on the web. Blake Gripling ( talk) 05:57, 10 November 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 15:33, 10 November 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 15:33, 10 November 2014 (UTC)
- Delete, Non notable vendor wothout any verified claims. Shashanksinghvi334 ( talk) 04:13, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
- Delete I don't know what an ink vendor would need to do to be notable, but this one exhibits no notability at all. LaMona ( talk) 23:32, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.