- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Natg 19 ( talk) 06:40, 7 November 2020 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Greatest Hits in Japan ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unremarkable bit of commercial exploitation. References are not sufficient to establish notability. Could be redirected to Queen discography, but there is no mention of it there. TheLongTone ( talk) 12:01, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 13:03, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 13:03, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
Comment Meets WP:NALBUM #2, it ranked at 7th on Oricon. I've also added the album to Queen discography, so it's a valid redirect target now. Jumpytoo Talk 21:31, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
- Keep Meets WP:NALBUM #2, it ranked at 7th on Oricon, and there is sufficient significant coverage that can be found on the Japanese Wikipedia article (examples [1] [2] [3]). Jumpytoo Talk 01:11, 31 October 2020 (UTC)
- Redirect to Queen discography#Compilation albums. No significant coverage in multiple reliable sources as required per WP:NALBUMS. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars Talk to me 22:52, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
Redirect to Queen discography#Compilation albums. This album gets closer to notability than the nominator implies. Reaching the top 10 in Japan certainly helps, and it got some American media coverage too (e.g. [4]). But otherwise it remains pretty obscure, unless anyone can come up with more reliable Japanese media coverage. (If it is entirely in Japanese, most of us here would be unable to search for it.) If that becomes available, the article can be revived from redirect status. DOOMSDAYER520 | TALK | CONTRIBS 23:52, 30 October 2020 (UTC)- Keep (changed vote) - I have changed my vote above thanks to the reliable Japanese sources found by Jumpytoo. See also [5]. DOOMSDAYER520 | TALK | CONTRIBS 16:30, 31 October 2020 (UTC)
- Keep per Jumpytoo. -- Moscow Connection ( talk) 21:10, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
- Keep: Article is good enough to pass WP:NALBUM with sources indicated above. ASTIG😎 ( ICE T • ICE CUBE) 16:00, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
- Keep - Meets WP:NALBUM. Serankail ( talk) 21:29, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Natg 19 ( talk) 06:40, 7 November 2020 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Greatest Hits in Japan ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unremarkable bit of commercial exploitation. References are not sufficient to establish notability. Could be redirected to Queen discography, but there is no mention of it there. TheLongTone ( talk) 12:01, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 13:03, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 13:03, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
Comment Meets WP:NALBUM #2, it ranked at 7th on Oricon. I've also added the album to Queen discography, so it's a valid redirect target now. Jumpytoo Talk 21:31, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
- Keep Meets WP:NALBUM #2, it ranked at 7th on Oricon, and there is sufficient significant coverage that can be found on the Japanese Wikipedia article (examples [1] [2] [3]). Jumpytoo Talk 01:11, 31 October 2020 (UTC)
- Redirect to Queen discography#Compilation albums. No significant coverage in multiple reliable sources as required per WP:NALBUMS. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars Talk to me 22:52, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
Redirect to Queen discography#Compilation albums. This album gets closer to notability than the nominator implies. Reaching the top 10 in Japan certainly helps, and it got some American media coverage too (e.g. [4]). But otherwise it remains pretty obscure, unless anyone can come up with more reliable Japanese media coverage. (If it is entirely in Japanese, most of us here would be unable to search for it.) If that becomes available, the article can be revived from redirect status. DOOMSDAYER520 | TALK | CONTRIBS 23:52, 30 October 2020 (UTC)- Keep (changed vote) - I have changed my vote above thanks to the reliable Japanese sources found by Jumpytoo. See also [5]. DOOMSDAYER520 | TALK | CONTRIBS 16:30, 31 October 2020 (UTC)
- Keep per Jumpytoo. -- Moscow Connection ( talk) 21:10, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
- Keep: Article is good enough to pass WP:NALBUM with sources indicated above. ASTIG😎 ( ICE T • ICE CUBE) 16:00, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
- Keep - Meets WP:NALBUM. Serankail ( talk) 21:29, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.