- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Euryalus ( talk) 12:59, 13 July 2016 (UTC)
Grant G. Mitman
- Grant G. Mitman ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Self-created article, no evidence of meeting WP:NACADEMICS Melcous ( talk) 10:51, 5 July 2016 (UTC)
- Comment He is much more frequently listed as Grant Mitman, without the middle initial, so I've added sources above for that name. Should the article remain, it should therefore be moved to Grant Mitman. Largoplazo ( talk) 14:34, 5 July 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. clpo13( talk) 15:47, 5 July 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Montana-related deletion discussions. clpo13( talk) 15:47, 5 July 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. Searching Google scholar for author:gg-mitman appears to zero in on his publications. But the citations aren't high enough for WP:PROF#C1 and there seems to be nothing else to use for notability. — David Eppstein ( talk) 04:45, 6 July 2016 (UTC)
- Delete as WP:Too Soon on basis of GS citations. Xxanthippe ( talk) 08:16, 6 July 2016 (UTC).
- Delete as still nothing minimally convincing for independent notability at all. SwisterTwister talk 02:45, 7 July 2016 (UTC)
- Delete an academic who comes no where near meeting any of our notability criteria for academics. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 04:28, 7 July 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Euryalus ( talk) 12:59, 13 July 2016 (UTC)
Grant G. Mitman
- Grant G. Mitman ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Self-created article, no evidence of meeting WP:NACADEMICS Melcous ( talk) 10:51, 5 July 2016 (UTC)
- Comment He is much more frequently listed as Grant Mitman, without the middle initial, so I've added sources above for that name. Should the article remain, it should therefore be moved to Grant Mitman. Largoplazo ( talk) 14:34, 5 July 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. clpo13( talk) 15:47, 5 July 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Montana-related deletion discussions. clpo13( talk) 15:47, 5 July 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. Searching Google scholar for author:gg-mitman appears to zero in on his publications. But the citations aren't high enough for WP:PROF#C1 and there seems to be nothing else to use for notability. — David Eppstein ( talk) 04:45, 6 July 2016 (UTC)
- Delete as WP:Too Soon on basis of GS citations. Xxanthippe ( talk) 08:16, 6 July 2016 (UTC).
- Delete as still nothing minimally convincing for independent notability at all. SwisterTwister talk 02:45, 7 July 2016 (UTC)
- Delete an academic who comes no where near meeting any of our notability criteria for academics. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 04:28, 7 July 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.