- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. North America 1000 09:54, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
Granny (video game series)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Granny (video game series) ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unfortunately non-notable as per WP:GNG on the basis of the lack of reliable sourcing and in-depth reviews. Know Your Meme and WikiHow are pretty cut and dry WP:USERG. A WP:BEFORE finds some brief analysis of a gameplay mechanic in the game in Game Rant [1] and some even briefer listicle-type assessments of the game in TheGamer [2] and Sportskeeda [3]. But I think this is well below the level of coverage needed as a whole if using the WP:THREE method. There isn't good guidance on notability for a series, but if there was one or two reviews out there for the other games, I would argue that a series such as this is not notable where (1) there's no in-depth coverage of the series as a whole body of work; and (2) none of the individual works in the series seem they would be independently notable. At any rate, open to views. ＶＲＸＣＥＳ ( talk) 07:22, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. ＶＲＸＣＥＳ ( talk) 07:22, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Wikipedia is not promotion and requires notability for an article to be made. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ) 08:08, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Simply not notable per WP:GNG like you said. TheWikiToby ( talk) 18:27, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Out of respect for the article creator, just flagging that @ Bennett1203: has added more sources to the article to "suppress deletion", although these seem to be the Steam and IMDb pages and the sources listed above. Of course they're definitely welcome to participate in the discussion if desired!
- Courtesy pinging Bennett1203 in case they haven't seen this comment (it is unsigned so the ping didn't work). ObserveOwl ( chit-chat • my doings) 18:24, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Hello. I am well aware of this yet I didn’t think to reply! At this point, this article was something I did because I wanted to help Wikipedia, however you guys can decide the deletion. Bennett1203 ( talk) 18:30, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Delete I hate to say it, but I found no sources to complement WP:GNG. Conyo14 ( talk) 19:19, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. North America 1000 09:54, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
Granny (video game series)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Granny (video game series) ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unfortunately non-notable as per WP:GNG on the basis of the lack of reliable sourcing and in-depth reviews. Know Your Meme and WikiHow are pretty cut and dry WP:USERG. A WP:BEFORE finds some brief analysis of a gameplay mechanic in the game in Game Rant [1] and some even briefer listicle-type assessments of the game in TheGamer [2] and Sportskeeda [3]. But I think this is well below the level of coverage needed as a whole if using the WP:THREE method. There isn't good guidance on notability for a series, but if there was one or two reviews out there for the other games, I would argue that a series such as this is not notable where (1) there's no in-depth coverage of the series as a whole body of work; and (2) none of the individual works in the series seem they would be independently notable. At any rate, open to views. ＶＲＸＣＥＳ ( talk) 07:22, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. ＶＲＸＣＥＳ ( talk) 07:22, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Wikipedia is not promotion and requires notability for an article to be made. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ) 08:08, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Simply not notable per WP:GNG like you said. TheWikiToby ( talk) 18:27, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Out of respect for the article creator, just flagging that @ Bennett1203: has added more sources to the article to "suppress deletion", although these seem to be the Steam and IMDb pages and the sources listed above. Of course they're definitely welcome to participate in the discussion if desired!
- Courtesy pinging Bennett1203 in case they haven't seen this comment (it is unsigned so the ping didn't work). ObserveOwl ( chit-chat • my doings) 18:24, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Hello. I am well aware of this yet I didn’t think to reply! At this point, this article was something I did because I wanted to help Wikipedia, however you guys can decide the deletion. Bennett1203 ( talk) 18:30, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Delete I hate to say it, but I found no sources to complement WP:GNG. Conyo14 ( talk) 19:19, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.