- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 19:47, 31 August 2017 (UTC)
Grand Hall Enterprise Company
- Grand Hall Enterprise Company ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Currently no notable content. Shaded0 ( talk) 18:15, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:22, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Taiwan-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:22, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
- Delete or speedy delete -- unsourced corporate spam and no claim of significance. We should expect better from company articles. K.e.coffman ( talk) 01:32, 25 August 2017 (UTC)
- Delete: An article about a company, with text giving no indication of encyclopaedic notability. The article was previously better before content removal by IPs, but was still short on references and anything going beyond WP:RUNOFTHEMILL. My searches are finding little beyond basic Taiwan Stock Exchange listing, which is insufficient in itself, and a negative consumer experience report. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH. AllyD ( talk) 07:55, 25 August 2017 (UTC)
- Delete Fails GNG, no indications of notability whatsoever. -- HighKing ++ 13:35, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
- Delete: An article about a company, with no indication of encyclopaedic notability. It is also short on references IMHO.-- ClrView ( talk) 17:34, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
- Delete: Lacks notability. - Ret.Prof ( talk) 20:54, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 19:47, 31 August 2017 (UTC)
Grand Hall Enterprise Company
- Grand Hall Enterprise Company ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Currently no notable content. Shaded0 ( talk) 18:15, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:22, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Taiwan-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:22, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
- Delete or speedy delete -- unsourced corporate spam and no claim of significance. We should expect better from company articles. K.e.coffman ( talk) 01:32, 25 August 2017 (UTC)
- Delete: An article about a company, with text giving no indication of encyclopaedic notability. The article was previously better before content removal by IPs, but was still short on references and anything going beyond WP:RUNOFTHEMILL. My searches are finding little beyond basic Taiwan Stock Exchange listing, which is insufficient in itself, and a negative consumer experience report. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH. AllyD ( talk) 07:55, 25 August 2017 (UTC)
- Delete Fails GNG, no indications of notability whatsoever. -- HighKing ++ 13:35, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
- Delete: An article about a company, with no indication of encyclopaedic notability. It is also short on references IMHO.-- ClrView ( talk) 17:34, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
- Delete: Lacks notability. - Ret.Prof ( talk) 20:54, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.