The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
This article does not satisfy
product notability or
general notability and reads like an advertisement. The references are not third-party, but are in the nature of published press releases or advertorials, and Google search turns up nothing written independently, only the usual vanity hits.
Robert McClenon (
talk) 22:08, 15 January 2018 (UTC)reply
This article is shown as having been accepted via
Articles for Creation. However, it was reviewed properly through AFC once and declined. It was then moved from draft space to article space by a paid editor, not by an AFC reviewer.
Robert McClenon (
talk) 22:33, 15 January 2018 (UTC)reply
Delete - I just saw this at AfC as it was a pending draft in the article space. Taking a look at the references, the article lacks
WP:CORPDEPTH. There are many references, but they are from unreliable sources or simply state general announcements about the company.
Delete - fails N - it's a prep test which may have significance for those about to take a test. Not seeing the required RS that make this one particularly notable over any other. Atsme📞📧 19:50, January 15, 2018 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
This article does not satisfy
product notability or
general notability and reads like an advertisement. The references are not third-party, but are in the nature of published press releases or advertorials, and Google search turns up nothing written independently, only the usual vanity hits.
Robert McClenon (
talk) 22:08, 15 January 2018 (UTC)reply
This article is shown as having been accepted via
Articles for Creation. However, it was reviewed properly through AFC once and declined. It was then moved from draft space to article space by a paid editor, not by an AFC reviewer.
Robert McClenon (
talk) 22:33, 15 January 2018 (UTC)reply
Delete - I just saw this at AfC as it was a pending draft in the article space. Taking a look at the references, the article lacks
WP:CORPDEPTH. There are many references, but they are from unreliable sources or simply state general announcements about the company.
Delete - fails N - it's a prep test which may have significance for those about to take a test. Not seeing the required RS that make this one particularly notable over any other. Atsme📞📧 19:50, January 15, 2018 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.