From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Randykitty ( talk) 12:13, 20 June 2019 (UTC) reply

Gordy Bunch

Gordy Bunch (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NPOL and the sources used do not go beyond the routine coverage that local politicians receive and therefore does not pass WP:GNG. GPL93 ( talk) 14:48, 5 June 2019 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. 94rain Talk 14:56, 5 June 2019 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. 94rain Talk 14:56, 5 June 2019 (UTC) reply
After further searching it seems that the subject passes WP:GNG on their extremely successful business career alone, therefore whether or not they satisfy WP:NPOL is irrelevant. Horse Eye Jack ( talk) 17:13, 6 June 2019 (UTC) reply
  • Delete fails WP:NPOL. The Woodlands, Texas is currently an unincorporated special purpose district in Texas and the chair of the township is elected by the other members of the board. While the Fox News article provides some nationalized coverage of the subject, the level of nationalized coverage is not what we typically desire for a local board member. -- Enos733 ( talk) 17:23, 6 June 2019 (UTC) reply
  • Delete. Notability for local political figures is not a question of the municipality's population — it depends on the quality of the sourcing, and a population of 100K is not an instant notability freebie for a mayor or municipal councillor or board chair in the absence of adequate sourcing. People also do not get Wikipedia articles for running as candidates for higher NPOL-passing offices — for "Texas State Senate" to have any bearing whatsoever on his notability, he would have to have won that election and thereby sat in the State Senate as a Senator, not just run and lose. But the references here are not building a strong case for his notability: they are nearly all primary sources and small community hyperlocals in which coverage of the local political scene is merely expected to exist, and the only one that's a genuinely national source just briefly mentions his existence in the context of being fundamentally about something other than him. This is not how you make people at this level of political office notable enough for Wikipedia articles: the notability test is not "as soon as his name has been mentioned in a national media source once" — he has to be the subject of substantive coverage, not just get namechecked in coverage of other things, before a source assists in building his notability at all. Bearcat ( talk) 18:42, 6 June 2019 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 19:56, 12 June 2019 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Randykitty ( talk) 12:13, 20 June 2019 (UTC) reply

Gordy Bunch

Gordy Bunch (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NPOL and the sources used do not go beyond the routine coverage that local politicians receive and therefore does not pass WP:GNG. GPL93 ( talk) 14:48, 5 June 2019 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. 94rain Talk 14:56, 5 June 2019 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. 94rain Talk 14:56, 5 June 2019 (UTC) reply
After further searching it seems that the subject passes WP:GNG on their extremely successful business career alone, therefore whether or not they satisfy WP:NPOL is irrelevant. Horse Eye Jack ( talk) 17:13, 6 June 2019 (UTC) reply
  • Delete fails WP:NPOL. The Woodlands, Texas is currently an unincorporated special purpose district in Texas and the chair of the township is elected by the other members of the board. While the Fox News article provides some nationalized coverage of the subject, the level of nationalized coverage is not what we typically desire for a local board member. -- Enos733 ( talk) 17:23, 6 June 2019 (UTC) reply
  • Delete. Notability for local political figures is not a question of the municipality's population — it depends on the quality of the sourcing, and a population of 100K is not an instant notability freebie for a mayor or municipal councillor or board chair in the absence of adequate sourcing. People also do not get Wikipedia articles for running as candidates for higher NPOL-passing offices — for "Texas State Senate" to have any bearing whatsoever on his notability, he would have to have won that election and thereby sat in the State Senate as a Senator, not just run and lose. But the references here are not building a strong case for his notability: they are nearly all primary sources and small community hyperlocals in which coverage of the local political scene is merely expected to exist, and the only one that's a genuinely national source just briefly mentions his existence in the context of being fundamentally about something other than him. This is not how you make people at this level of political office notable enough for Wikipedia articles: the notability test is not "as soon as his name has been mentioned in a national media source once" — he has to be the subject of substantive coverage, not just get namechecked in coverage of other things, before a source assists in building his notability at all. Bearcat ( talk) 18:42, 6 June 2019 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 19:56, 12 June 2019 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook