The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 07:03, 30 April 2011 (UTC)reply
Contested prod of non-notable internet product with no significant secondary coverage, that makes no claim to notability or attempt at communication of the subject
Sadads (
talk) 00:00, 22 April 2011 (UTC)reply
Delete per nom. Also, the
only citation seems very promotional. /
edg☺☭ 00:54, 22 April 2011 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 07:03, 30 April 2011 (UTC)reply
Contested prod of non-notable internet product with no significant secondary coverage, that makes no claim to notability or attempt at communication of the subject
Sadads (
talk) 00:00, 22 April 2011 (UTC)reply
Delete per nom. Also, the
only citation seems very promotional. /
edg☺☭ 00:54, 22 April 2011 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.