- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- BDD ( talk) 19:52, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
Good Harbour International
- Good Harbour International ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Promotional article on company. Sources are either trivial or press releases, or merely mention the company (e.g. the counter-terrorism unit in the tile of ref six is not the company, but the article has at the end a quote from the company's president) The source from us.gov did not even mention the company at all. I am also nominating a related page which has even weaker references: Good Harbor Consulting ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) DGG ( talk ) 22:00, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 23:05, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Washington, DC-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 23:06, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
-
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ethically ( Yours) 16:30, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- BDD ( talk) 19:52, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
Good Harbour International
- Good Harbour International ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Promotional article on company. Sources are either trivial or press releases, or merely mention the company (e.g. the counter-terrorism unit in the tile of ref six is not the company, but the article has at the end a quote from the company's president) The source from us.gov did not even mention the company at all. I am also nominating a related page which has even weaker references: Good Harbor Consulting ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) DGG ( talk ) 22:00, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 23:05, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Washington, DC-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 23:06, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
-
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ethically ( Yours) 16:30, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.