- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. j⚛e decker talk 03:18, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
Glenn Fleishman
- Glenn Fleishman ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The subject of the article does not meet the WP:GNG. It contains original research possibly from people close to the subject of the article. 8/9 of the current references are not independent of the subject and are not secondary sources because they were written by the subject of the article. Weedwacker ( talk) 01:12, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 03:03, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 03:03, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 03:04, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 03:04, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
- Delete lacks adequate 3rd party sourcing. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 02:16, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NORTH AMERICA 1000 11:15, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NORTH AMERICA 1000 11:15, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
- Delete - for want of significant coverage in reliable, third-party sources, etc. Neutrality talk 23:44, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
- Keep Evidently needs improvement, but the subject certainly warrants inclusion in WP. Article can easily be improved by normal editing and development. Akma ( talk) 08:13, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
- Can you elaborate on why this subject warrants inclusion? Seems to be a non-notable journalist. Weedwacker ( talk) 03:03, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
- Glenn Fleischmann is a prominent journalist, author, and public figure. You're obviously free to dismiss his importance, but the cost of maintaining a page that clarifies his identity seems small enough. Akma ( talk) 18:16, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. j⚛e decker talk 03:18, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
Glenn Fleishman
- Glenn Fleishman ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The subject of the article does not meet the WP:GNG. It contains original research possibly from people close to the subject of the article. 8/9 of the current references are not independent of the subject and are not secondary sources because they were written by the subject of the article. Weedwacker ( talk) 01:12, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 03:03, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 03:03, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 03:04, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 03:04, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
- Delete lacks adequate 3rd party sourcing. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 02:16, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NORTH AMERICA 1000 11:15, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NORTH AMERICA 1000 11:15, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
- Delete - for want of significant coverage in reliable, third-party sources, etc. Neutrality talk 23:44, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
- Keep Evidently needs improvement, but the subject certainly warrants inclusion in WP. Article can easily be improved by normal editing and development. Akma ( talk) 08:13, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
- Can you elaborate on why this subject warrants inclusion? Seems to be a non-notable journalist. Weedwacker ( talk) 03:03, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
- Glenn Fleischmann is a prominent journalist, author, and public figure. You're obviously free to dismiss his importance, but the cost of maintaining a page that clarifies his identity seems small enough. Akma ( talk) 18:16, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.