The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
How notable is this person? Not so much
Pyrusca (
talk) 14:11, 13 November 2016 (UTC)reply
Keep. A quick look at the results of the Google Books and Scholar searches linked above shows that the answer to the question posed by the nominator is "pretty damn notable".
86.17.222.157 (
talk) 15:42, 13 November 2016 (UTC)reply
Is the fact that a 13th-century poet is still being discussed in 21st-century reliable sources not an indication of notability?
86.17.222.157 (
talk) 08:57, 14 November 2016 (UTC)reply
Keep Significant Syriac liturgical poet of the 13 century per sources at article, some of which were added after this was originally nominated.
24.151.10.165 (
talk) 17:56, 14 November 2016 (UTC)reply
Speedy keep sources suffice to establish that this was a notable medieval poet.
E.M.Gregory (
talk) 13:10, 17 November 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
How notable is this person? Not so much
Pyrusca (
talk) 14:11, 13 November 2016 (UTC)reply
Keep. A quick look at the results of the Google Books and Scholar searches linked above shows that the answer to the question posed by the nominator is "pretty damn notable".
86.17.222.157 (
talk) 15:42, 13 November 2016 (UTC)reply
Is the fact that a 13th-century poet is still being discussed in 21st-century reliable sources not an indication of notability?
86.17.222.157 (
talk) 08:57, 14 November 2016 (UTC)reply
Keep Significant Syriac liturgical poet of the 13 century per sources at article, some of which were added after this was originally nominated.
24.151.10.165 (
talk) 17:56, 14 November 2016 (UTC)reply
Speedy keep sources suffice to establish that this was a notable medieval poet.
E.M.Gregory (
talk) 13:10, 17 November 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.