The result was Delete -- Anthony.bradbury "talk" 21:44, 27 August 2007 (UTC) reply
Not notable. Appears to be a small time theatre actor. Dev920 (Have a nice day!) 08:51, 22 August 2007 (UTC) reply
Pat are you seriously saying that roles such as "receptionist" and "Woman at Grotto" are not bit parts?? 3tmx 20:01, 24 August 2007 (UTC) reply
In fact someone without an account signing themselves ginnibarlow has been making contributions to various take the high road related pages. Doesn't the fact the person (if they are who they say) was involved in the show call into question ALL their edits to the related pages and the four "take the high road" pages they created?
3tmx 20:22, 24 August 2007 (UTC) reply
And IMDB doesn't describe it as a "significant part" either, in fact it does not provide dates, so as a citation its fairly poor. 3tmx 20:40, 24 August 2007 (UTC) reply
Firstly, I am not disputing that some of these parts may have been bit parts, but I understand it that her parts in Garnock Way and Take the High Road were not, they were long-running parts. Secondly, it is possible that Ginni Barlow herself has been editing the Take the High Road article, although I was not aware of this until you mentioned this. However, if you look at the changes you will see that it has just been a few limited tidy-ups, I see no grounds whatsoever for suspecting that these are bad faith or erroneous edits. I have seen a number of Wikipedia articles which have been edited by people with some personal involvement e.g. Nigel Short, Koo Stark, Margaret Curran and Tashi Tenzing, this is not necessarily illegitimate. PatGallacher 00:23, 25 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete -- Anthony.bradbury "talk" 21:44, 27 August 2007 (UTC) reply
Not notable. Appears to be a small time theatre actor. Dev920 (Have a nice day!) 08:51, 22 August 2007 (UTC) reply
Pat are you seriously saying that roles such as "receptionist" and "Woman at Grotto" are not bit parts?? 3tmx 20:01, 24 August 2007 (UTC) reply
In fact someone without an account signing themselves ginnibarlow has been making contributions to various take the high road related pages. Doesn't the fact the person (if they are who they say) was involved in the show call into question ALL their edits to the related pages and the four "take the high road" pages they created?
3tmx 20:22, 24 August 2007 (UTC) reply
And IMDB doesn't describe it as a "significant part" either, in fact it does not provide dates, so as a citation its fairly poor. 3tmx 20:40, 24 August 2007 (UTC) reply
Firstly, I am not disputing that some of these parts may have been bit parts, but I understand it that her parts in Garnock Way and Take the High Road were not, they were long-running parts. Secondly, it is possible that Ginni Barlow herself has been editing the Take the High Road article, although I was not aware of this until you mentioned this. However, if you look at the changes you will see that it has just been a few limited tidy-ups, I see no grounds whatsoever for suspecting that these are bad faith or erroneous edits. I have seen a number of Wikipedia articles which have been edited by people with some personal involvement e.g. Nigel Short, Koo Stark, Margaret Curran and Tashi Tenzing, this is not necessarily illegitimate. PatGallacher 00:23, 25 August 2007 (UTC) reply