The result was keep. CBE recipient; therefore, meets ANYBIO. (non-admin closure) Strikerforce Talk 16:27, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
WP:BLP of a city councillor, who is not reliably sourced well enough to clear WP:NPOL #2. As always, Wikipedia does not extend an automatic presumption of notability to every city councillor who exists -- city councillors only get that in internationally prominent global cities on the order of New York City or London, and in any city outside that rarefied class they get articles only if the sourcing marks them out as a special case over and above most other city councillors. But the references here aren't doing that at all: two are his own primary sources about himself (his profile on the city's website and his own LinkedIn résumé), one is a glancing namecheck of his existence in purely routine election coverage, one is a glancing namecheck of his existence in an article about the death of his mother, and only one source is about him in any non-trivial way. But there's not a city councillor on the planet who couldn't show one reliable source, so that isn't enough sourcing all by itself to make a city councillor notable. Bearcat ( talk) 16:57, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
The result was keep. CBE recipient; therefore, meets ANYBIO. (non-admin closure) Strikerforce Talk 16:27, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
WP:BLP of a city councillor, who is not reliably sourced well enough to clear WP:NPOL #2. As always, Wikipedia does not extend an automatic presumption of notability to every city councillor who exists -- city councillors only get that in internationally prominent global cities on the order of New York City or London, and in any city outside that rarefied class they get articles only if the sourcing marks them out as a special case over and above most other city councillors. But the references here aren't doing that at all: two are his own primary sources about himself (his profile on the city's website and his own LinkedIn résumé), one is a glancing namecheck of his existence in purely routine election coverage, one is a glancing namecheck of his existence in an article about the death of his mother, and only one source is about him in any non-trivial way. But there's not a city councillor on the planet who couldn't show one reliable source, so that isn't enough sourcing all by itself to make a city councillor notable. Bearcat ( talk) 16:57, 11 June 2018 (UTC)