The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. After 3 relists there's still no consensus to Keep or Delete. (
non-admin closure) –
Davey2010Talk 03:19, 5 December 2015 (UTC)reply
Recently created article about a non-notable author whose only claim to fame seems to be a self-published book. Briefly mentioned by Iranian TV when he died, but still a long way from established notability. A quick Internet search did not yield any further indicators of notability.
Jeppiz (
talk) 02:00, 7 November 2015 (UTC)
I am also nominating the self-published book, added yesterday by the same user, failing notability :reply
Needs investigation - the article about the book claims that it is very well known in the Arab-speaking world, with over a million sales. I do not speak Arabic to search for suitable references, but it seems that we should look into the question of notability beyond just English-language references. --
Gronk Oz (
talk) 15:42, 7 November 2015 (UTC)reply
Good point, though I think the claimed sales are mainly for Persian, not the Arab-speaking world, if I understand the source right. It sounds surprising, and if it is true, it sounds even more surprising the English translation would be self-published; publishing houses would be likely to jump at the opportunity to give out a translation of a book that has sold that much. So of course it's possible, but something seems strange. Needless to say, we're not in a hurry, and if somebody who speaks Persian finds reliable sources of notability, it would of course change the situation. In English, though, there seems to be next to nothing.
Jeppiz (
talk) 16:25, 7 November 2015 (UTC)reply
KeepGeorge Jordac, not sure on
The Voice of Human Justice. My Persian isn't too good, but I found enough articles in Arabic to convince me of this author's notability. See
[1],
[2],
[3],
[4].
An-Nahar and
Al Arabiya, in particular, are high-quality sources. As for the book, I don't know.
Worldcat shows over 100 library holdings in the US alone, and shows 18 editions, so I think it's unlikely that the book was self-published. I would probably lean on the side of keep. --
Cerebellum (
talk) 01:50, 14 November 2015 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Spirit of Eagle (
talk) 04:42, 14 November 2015 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —
UY ScutiTalk 18:52, 21 November 2015 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Final relist. Esquivaliencet 16:48, 28 November 2015 (UTC)reply
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Esquivaliencet 16:48, 28 November 2015 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. After 3 relists there's still no consensus to Keep or Delete. (
non-admin closure) –
Davey2010Talk 03:19, 5 December 2015 (UTC)reply
Recently created article about a non-notable author whose only claim to fame seems to be a self-published book. Briefly mentioned by Iranian TV when he died, but still a long way from established notability. A quick Internet search did not yield any further indicators of notability.
Jeppiz (
talk) 02:00, 7 November 2015 (UTC)
I am also nominating the self-published book, added yesterday by the same user, failing notability :reply
Needs investigation - the article about the book claims that it is very well known in the Arab-speaking world, with over a million sales. I do not speak Arabic to search for suitable references, but it seems that we should look into the question of notability beyond just English-language references. --
Gronk Oz (
talk) 15:42, 7 November 2015 (UTC)reply
Good point, though I think the claimed sales are mainly for Persian, not the Arab-speaking world, if I understand the source right. It sounds surprising, and if it is true, it sounds even more surprising the English translation would be self-published; publishing houses would be likely to jump at the opportunity to give out a translation of a book that has sold that much. So of course it's possible, but something seems strange. Needless to say, we're not in a hurry, and if somebody who speaks Persian finds reliable sources of notability, it would of course change the situation. In English, though, there seems to be next to nothing.
Jeppiz (
talk) 16:25, 7 November 2015 (UTC)reply
KeepGeorge Jordac, not sure on
The Voice of Human Justice. My Persian isn't too good, but I found enough articles in Arabic to convince me of this author's notability. See
[1],
[2],
[3],
[4].
An-Nahar and
Al Arabiya, in particular, are high-quality sources. As for the book, I don't know.
Worldcat shows over 100 library holdings in the US alone, and shows 18 editions, so I think it's unlikely that the book was self-published. I would probably lean on the side of keep. --
Cerebellum (
talk) 01:50, 14 November 2015 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Spirit of Eagle (
talk) 04:42, 14 November 2015 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —
UY ScutiTalk 18:52, 21 November 2015 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Final relist. Esquivaliencet 16:48, 28 November 2015 (UTC)reply
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Esquivaliencet 16:48, 28 November 2015 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.