From
Wikipedia:Votes for deletion
I wish to advise that the Imperial Administration has decided to withdraw its support of the Wikipedia project, and I therefore request the immediate deletion of this article.
LOL! Bwahahahahahahahahahaha! -- Zoe\
lol Vera Cruz
I know we only ADD information to the encyclopedia, but ... this strikes me as adolescent self-aggrandizement. Reads like a resume. Looks like something I would have posted on E2 when I was 14 about myself. What, if anything, should be done?
--dreamword (who, were he emperor of Wikipedia, would show no mercy to micronation silliness)
Also: note that by the above I do not mean any disrespect to the Emperor himself; if he is indeed Gene Poole, he's made many good contributions to the 'pedia. It's just .... maybe this belongs on user:Gene Poole instead. -- Dreamword 03:21 Jan 23, 2003 (UTC)
The bio should be either wholly in or wholly out. My activities as a Wiki contributor are a private matter, and remain entirely unrelated to my public political activities. -- Gene Poole
That seems like a clear vote to delete to me (7 delete, 1 merge, 1 keep). So why was this copied here? -- Wik 17:34, Feb 8, 2004 (UTC)
7 to 1 -- which I would make 8 to 1 if the article weren't already deleted -- is a pretty clear consensus, isn't it? -- No-One Jones (talk) 21:14, 8 Feb 2004 (UTC)
Redirected to Atlantium. Votes, counting me, were 11 to delete, 1 to merge, and 1 to keep. That's 12-1 against keeping this as an individual page, which is a clear consensus. -- Delirium 02:49, Feb 9, 2004 (UTC)
My public life is not exclusively synonymous with Atlantium. If there is to be no acknowledgement of other noteworthy aspects of my life then the redirection is false and misleading, and should be removed altogether -- Gene Poole
From
Wikipedia:Votes for deletion
I wish to advise that the Imperial Administration has decided to withdraw its support of the Wikipedia project, and I therefore request the immediate deletion of this article.
LOL! Bwahahahahahahahahahaha! -- Zoe\
lol Vera Cruz
I know we only ADD information to the encyclopedia, but ... this strikes me as adolescent self-aggrandizement. Reads like a resume. Looks like something I would have posted on E2 when I was 14 about myself. What, if anything, should be done?
--dreamword (who, were he emperor of Wikipedia, would show no mercy to micronation silliness)
Also: note that by the above I do not mean any disrespect to the Emperor himself; if he is indeed Gene Poole, he's made many good contributions to the 'pedia. It's just .... maybe this belongs on user:Gene Poole instead. -- Dreamword 03:21 Jan 23, 2003 (UTC)
The bio should be either wholly in or wholly out. My activities as a Wiki contributor are a private matter, and remain entirely unrelated to my public political activities. -- Gene Poole
That seems like a clear vote to delete to me (7 delete, 1 merge, 1 keep). So why was this copied here? -- Wik 17:34, Feb 8, 2004 (UTC)
7 to 1 -- which I would make 8 to 1 if the article weren't already deleted -- is a pretty clear consensus, isn't it? -- No-One Jones (talk) 21:14, 8 Feb 2004 (UTC)
Redirected to Atlantium. Votes, counting me, were 11 to delete, 1 to merge, and 1 to keep. That's 12-1 against keeping this as an individual page, which is a clear consensus. -- Delirium 02:49, Feb 9, 2004 (UTC)
My public life is not exclusively synonymous with Atlantium. If there is to be no acknowledgement of other noteworthy aspects of my life then the redirection is false and misleading, and should be removed altogether -- Gene Poole