 | This discussion was subject to a
deletion review on 2016 August 22. For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review. |
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง ( talk) 16:17, 1 August 2016 (UTC)
Georg Kraus
- Georg Kraus ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not notable. Lacks coverage in independent reliable sources, sourcing is mostly by him, not about him. duffbeerforme ( talk) 07:47, 24 July 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log ( step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2016 July 24. — cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 08:02, 24 July 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Sam Sailor Talk! 10:42, 24 July 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. Sam Sailor Talk! 10:42, 24 July 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Kraus is a non-notable expert in business. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 17:46, 24 July 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. Not enough GS citations to satisfy WP:Prof#C1 yet: WP:Too soon. Xxanthippe ( talk) 22:26, 24 July 2016 (UTC).
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
| This discussion was subject to a
deletion review on 2016 August 22. For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review. |
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง ( talk) 16:17, 1 August 2016 (UTC)
Georg Kraus
- Georg Kraus ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not notable. Lacks coverage in independent reliable sources, sourcing is mostly by him, not about him. duffbeerforme ( talk) 07:47, 24 July 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log ( step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2016 July 24. — cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 08:02, 24 July 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Sam Sailor Talk! 10:42, 24 July 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. Sam Sailor Talk! 10:42, 24 July 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Kraus is a non-notable expert in business. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 17:46, 24 July 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. Not enough GS citations to satisfy WP:Prof#C1 yet: WP:Too soon. Xxanthippe ( talk) 22:26, 24 July 2016 (UTC).
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.