The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep.—
Quarl(
talk) 2007-03-09 09:41Z
Keep. Needs cleanup to conform to
WP:NPOV, but appears to be a notable genomics technique. Just because the patent hasn't expired doesn't mean it's automatically an advertisement. —
Carolfrog22:05, 4 March 2007 (UTC)reply
Keep - Evidence of notability with strong references. Needs cleanup but has decent amount of NPOV material there. —dgiestc01:17, 5 March 2007 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep.—
Quarl(
talk) 2007-03-09 09:41Z
Keep. Needs cleanup to conform to
WP:NPOV, but appears to be a notable genomics technique. Just because the patent hasn't expired doesn't mean it's automatically an advertisement. —
Carolfrog22:05, 4 March 2007 (UTC)reply
Keep - Evidence of notability with strong references. Needs cleanup but has decent amount of NPOV material there. —dgiestc01:17, 5 March 2007 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.