The result was delete. Consensus is that the new sources suggested in the AfD are not of sufficient scope or reliability to constitute significant coverage establishing notability. Mkativerata ( talk) 20:18, 30 August 2011 (UTC) reply
Non-notable church. The only significant coverage I can find is [1]. Even this has as much about the interjector as the it does the subject. The rest of the linked newspaper article smells a bit like a press release. No in-depth widespread coverage. Fails WP:ORG. I have previously tagged for notability. Quality of text has deteriorated markedly in recent edits. Bleakcomb ( talk) 01:07, 16 August 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Consensus is that the new sources suggested in the AfD are not of sufficient scope or reliability to constitute significant coverage establishing notability. Mkativerata ( talk) 20:18, 30 August 2011 (UTC) reply
Non-notable church. The only significant coverage I can find is [1]. Even this has as much about the interjector as the it does the subject. The rest of the linked newspaper article smells a bit like a press release. No in-depth widespread coverage. Fails WP:ORG. I have previously tagged for notability. Quality of text has deteriorated markedly in recent edits. Bleakcomb ( talk) 01:07, 16 August 2011 (UTC) reply