The result was no consensus. Listed for 12 days with no arguments for deletion aside from the nominator but not enough participation to determine consensus. ( non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman ( talk) 23:28, 23 October 2009 (UTC) reply
Tagged for notability since April '08. One source, which is a highly trivial mention in PC Gamer UK, a tiny sidebar in the downloadable content section. [1] This is the only reliable source and isn't even significant coverage. Last AFD mentioned a press page on the game's website which has a number of unreliable trivial mentions, none of which are suitable. [2] In the end there is no way this topic is significant enough to find enough WP:RS to meet Wikipedia's requirements. Andre ( talk) 20:21, 11 October 2009 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus. Listed for 12 days with no arguments for deletion aside from the nominator but not enough participation to determine consensus. ( non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman ( talk) 23:28, 23 October 2009 (UTC) reply
Tagged for notability since April '08. One source, which is a highly trivial mention in PC Gamer UK, a tiny sidebar in the downloadable content section. [1] This is the only reliable source and isn't even significant coverage. Last AFD mentioned a press page on the game's website which has a number of unreliable trivial mentions, none of which are suitable. [2] In the end there is no way this topic is significant enough to find enough WP:RS to meet Wikipedia's requirements. Andre ( talk) 20:21, 11 October 2009 (UTC) reply