The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus.
W.marsh 17:35, 31 January 2007 (UTC)reply
Fails the proposed
WP:PROG and
WP:N in general. And
WP:CORP, too. Prodded by me, prodding endorsed by
Drat, prod tag removed by article's creator and primary author
Londonboy1972.
Jobjörn (
Talk °
contribs) 17:49, 24 January 2007 (UTC)reply
Delete, per nom.--
Drat (
Talk) 01:51, 25 January 2007 (UTC)reply
Keep - The article has
verifiable references. As a component of 10 different games that have Wikipedia articles,
notability is established (although I would like to see a footnote listing the source, presumpably PC Gamer issue 164, for this product's inclusion in those games). I don't vote "keep" very often, but as this article is well-written, Wikified, and so forth, I think the principle of giving the benefit of doubt applies here.
Shaundakulbara 07:18, 25 January 2007 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus.
W.marsh 17:35, 31 January 2007 (UTC)reply
Fails the proposed
WP:PROG and
WP:N in general. And
WP:CORP, too. Prodded by me, prodding endorsed by
Drat, prod tag removed by article's creator and primary author
Londonboy1972.
Jobjörn (
Talk °
contribs) 17:49, 24 January 2007 (UTC)reply
Delete, per nom.--
Drat (
Talk) 01:51, 25 January 2007 (UTC)reply
Keep - The article has
verifiable references. As a component of 10 different games that have Wikipedia articles,
notability is established (although I would like to see a footnote listing the source, presumpably PC Gamer issue 164, for this product's inclusion in those games). I don't vote "keep" very often, but as this article is well-written, Wikified, and so forth, I think the principle of giving the benefit of doubt applies here.
Shaundakulbara 07:18, 25 January 2007 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.