- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. The argument that being a fellow of the NYAM does not satisfy NACADEMIC is compelling and there doesn't seem so be anything else. Randykitty ( talk) 14:08, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
Gail B. Nayowith
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Gail B. Nayowith ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Was deprodded with the rationale that they are a fellow of the NY Academy of Medicine, which does not qualify for NSCHOLAR. Not enough in-depth coverage to show she meets WP:GNG, and does not meet any of the SNGs. Onel5969 TT me 13:42, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators and Women. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:50, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 14:07, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
- Speedy Keep She passed
WP:NACADEMIC#3 as a fellow of the
New York Academy of Medicine. I am surprised to see this article being nominated for deletion after pointing out to the nominator that the subject of the article passed WP: NACADEMIC as a fellow of the New York Academy of Medicine. This raises serious concerns about the quality of the review you do, @
User:Onel5969. More concerning is that you are one of the most active new page patrollers. Inappropriate tagging and the nomination of pages such as this for deletion are two of the behaviors that drive away new editors. You really need to think about this and slow down.
Shoerack (
talk)
14:20, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks for the personal attack. And being a fellow of a local organization, such as New York Academy of Medicine, which literally has thousands of fellows, which is quite high for a local organization. Onel5969 TT me 14:34, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
- It wasn't intended to be an attack. I apologize that it appears that way to you. That said, I'd encourage you to slow down on how quickly you tag articles with the notability tag. Shoerack ( talk) 15:06, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
-
Shoerack, please do not follow Onel to other articles, as you did as
here and
here. Following editors you are in disagreement with to other articles to disagree with them there too is considered
WP:HOUNDING and is sanctionable if it becomes a habit.
Curbon7 (
talk)
14:53, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
- For the record, this isn't meant to be a warning or a threat or anything like that, just a nudge to notify you of a thing you may not have been aware of but that we take very seriously. Curbon7 ( talk) 15:08, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
-
Shoerack, please do not follow Onel to other articles, as you did as
here and
here. Following editors you are in disagreement with to other articles to disagree with them there too is considered
WP:HOUNDING and is sanctionable if it becomes a habit.
Curbon7 (
talk)
14:53, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
- Delete: Per our article on it, the NYAM is a "health policy and advocacy organization", so it is not an academic fellowship for the purposes of WP:NPROF. Additionally, with only one full publication which has only a couple citations and no professional reviews, she does not meet WP:NAUTHOR. There does not appear to be significant coverage for the purposes of WP:GNG. Curbon7 ( talk) 14:36, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
- According to our article, it is a major center for health education. We are talking about an organization that was established in 1847. On average, they induct about 20 fellows annually and applicants for fellowship are "subject to a rigorous review and approval process." Shoerack ( talk) 14:59, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
- Comment she's in several New York Times articles about expanding junior kindergarten programs, but I'm at my limit for free articles. Not sure the fellowship alone is notable, but if we had more RS, we could be at notability.
Oaktree b (
talk)
15:17, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
-
[1]
[2] Gifting two of the NYT articles I could find.
Curbon7 (
talk)
15:57, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you, those appear trivial coverage. Delete is my !vote. I'm not swayed that the NYAM is a notable appointment, it appears to advise the city on public health matters or makes them directly. Oaktree b ( talk) 16:18, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
-
[1]
[2] Gifting two of the NYT articles I could find.
Curbon7 (
talk)
15:57, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. The argument that being a fellow of the NYAM does not satisfy NACADEMIC is compelling and there doesn't seem so be anything else. Randykitty ( talk) 14:08, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
Gail B. Nayowith
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Gail B. Nayowith ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Was deprodded with the rationale that they are a fellow of the NY Academy of Medicine, which does not qualify for NSCHOLAR. Not enough in-depth coverage to show she meets WP:GNG, and does not meet any of the SNGs. Onel5969 TT me 13:42, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators and Women. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:50, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 14:07, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
- Speedy Keep She passed
WP:NACADEMIC#3 as a fellow of the
New York Academy of Medicine. I am surprised to see this article being nominated for deletion after pointing out to the nominator that the subject of the article passed WP: NACADEMIC as a fellow of the New York Academy of Medicine. This raises serious concerns about the quality of the review you do, @
User:Onel5969. More concerning is that you are one of the most active new page patrollers. Inappropriate tagging and the nomination of pages such as this for deletion are two of the behaviors that drive away new editors. You really need to think about this and slow down.
Shoerack (
talk)
14:20, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks for the personal attack. And being a fellow of a local organization, such as New York Academy of Medicine, which literally has thousands of fellows, which is quite high for a local organization. Onel5969 TT me 14:34, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
- It wasn't intended to be an attack. I apologize that it appears that way to you. That said, I'd encourage you to slow down on how quickly you tag articles with the notability tag. Shoerack ( talk) 15:06, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
-
Shoerack, please do not follow Onel to other articles, as you did as
here and
here. Following editors you are in disagreement with to other articles to disagree with them there too is considered
WP:HOUNDING and is sanctionable if it becomes a habit.
Curbon7 (
talk)
14:53, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
- For the record, this isn't meant to be a warning or a threat or anything like that, just a nudge to notify you of a thing you may not have been aware of but that we take very seriously. Curbon7 ( talk) 15:08, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
-
Shoerack, please do not follow Onel to other articles, as you did as
here and
here. Following editors you are in disagreement with to other articles to disagree with them there too is considered
WP:HOUNDING and is sanctionable if it becomes a habit.
Curbon7 (
talk)
14:53, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
- Delete: Per our article on it, the NYAM is a "health policy and advocacy organization", so it is not an academic fellowship for the purposes of WP:NPROF. Additionally, with only one full publication which has only a couple citations and no professional reviews, she does not meet WP:NAUTHOR. There does not appear to be significant coverage for the purposes of WP:GNG. Curbon7 ( talk) 14:36, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
- According to our article, it is a major center for health education. We are talking about an organization that was established in 1847. On average, they induct about 20 fellows annually and applicants for fellowship are "subject to a rigorous review and approval process." Shoerack ( talk) 14:59, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
- Comment she's in several New York Times articles about expanding junior kindergarten programs, but I'm at my limit for free articles. Not sure the fellowship alone is notable, but if we had more RS, we could be at notability.
Oaktree b (
talk)
15:17, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
-
[1]
[2] Gifting two of the NYT articles I could find.
Curbon7 (
talk)
15:57, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you, those appear trivial coverage. Delete is my !vote. I'm not swayed that the NYAM is a notable appointment, it appears to advise the city on public health matters or makes them directly. Oaktree b ( talk) 16:18, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
-
[1]
[2] Gifting two of the NYT articles I could find.
Curbon7 (
talk)
15:57, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.