- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 12:43, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Gaia Foundation ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Couldn't find anything to prove notability. Many databases prove the organizations existence, but there's no SIGCOV here. NotAGenious ( talk) 16:38, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. NotAGenious ( talk) 16:38, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:18, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
The Gaia Foundation remains an important international environmental group operating out of London. It's Brazilian counterpart under Jose Luzenberger (Ex Minister for the environment) has played an important role in preservation of the Amazon, and the Australian counterpart was important in the preservation of the native forests of Western Australia, through the work of Vivienne Elanta.
Regards John Croft — Preceding unsigned comment added by 103.12.202.49 ( talk) 01:15, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
- That is an admirable goal for sure. But, we're looking at whether the company meets
Wikipedia's notability criteria.
NotAGenious (
talk)
05:54, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
- I agree: it's admirable, but not notable. Lambtron talk 04:10, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
- Delete since there's no indication of notability. Lambtron talk 04:10, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗ plicit 23:38, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
- Delete. I can't find anything which counts towards GNG. They definitely exist, and there are various mentions of their existence on e.g. the webpages of related charities, but I haven't found any in-depth independent coverage which counts for notability. Caeciliusinhorto-public ( talk) 10:54, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 12:43, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Gaia Foundation ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Couldn't find anything to prove notability. Many databases prove the organizations existence, but there's no SIGCOV here. NotAGenious ( talk) 16:38, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. NotAGenious ( talk) 16:38, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:18, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
The Gaia Foundation remains an important international environmental group operating out of London. It's Brazilian counterpart under Jose Luzenberger (Ex Minister for the environment) has played an important role in preservation of the Amazon, and the Australian counterpart was important in the preservation of the native forests of Western Australia, through the work of Vivienne Elanta.
Regards John Croft — Preceding unsigned comment added by 103.12.202.49 ( talk) 01:15, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
- That is an admirable goal for sure. But, we're looking at whether the company meets
Wikipedia's notability criteria.
NotAGenious (
talk)
05:54, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
- I agree: it's admirable, but not notable. Lambtron talk 04:10, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
- Delete since there's no indication of notability. Lambtron talk 04:10, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗ plicit 23:38, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
- Delete. I can't find anything which counts towards GNG. They definitely exist, and there are various mentions of their existence on e.g. the webpages of related charities, but I haven't found any in-depth independent coverage which counts for notability. Caeciliusinhorto-public ( talk) 10:54, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.