The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. After three relists I can't see any consensus here on whether the notability guidelines are met.
Davewild (
talk) 07:17, 19 May 2015 (UTC)reply
BLP that has been around for 3 months with no substantive refs. Fails all relevant notability criteria VelellaVelella Talk 22:01, 19 April 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete - Not sure why I !voted Keep and not really sure how I came to post those sources as they're piss poor!, I can't find anything to suggest notability, Sure she's been in a few movies but it's the notability we're judging here not how many movies she's in/been in. –
Davey2010Talk 20:44, 28 April 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete The one reference on this article is a blog post on an individual's blog, so it really should be removed. The gmanetwork links appear to be promotional by the TV company. The Manila Standard articles contain mentions in their entertainment pages, but at least one didn't name her at all.
LaMona (
talk) 22:51, 25 April 2015 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, §
FreeRangeFrogcroak 21:16, 26 April 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete with no prejudice for recreating if and when she achieves greater recognition.
Renata (
talk) 21:23, 26 April 2015 (UTC)reply
Keep. Currently has a major role in
InstaDad and presumably in Let the Love Begin (not the one linked above as that was a movie), passing the threshold for
WP:NACTOR #1: "Has had significant roles in multiple... television shows." –HTD 16:21, 27 April 2015 (UTC)reply
Weak keep per reasoning given by
Howard the Duck, subject clearly passes criteria #1 of
WP:NACTOR. However, if NACTOR was not a notability guideline, it would be a tough sell IMHO. The subject has received
significant coverage in multiple reliable sources, but those sources are primarily GMA News and Philippine Entertainment Portal ( a joint venture between GMA &
Summit Media), both with connections to the media company which airs the shows which the subject of this AfD stars in. Therefore, it could be argued that those sources are not
independent sources. Either way, cannot support deletion due to NACTOR, and
deletion is not a substitution for article improvement.--
RightCowLeftCoast (
talk) 02:02, 30 April 2015 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 10:48, 5 May 2015 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached. Relisting comment: Final relist. Esquivaliencet 02:41, 12 May 2015 (UTC)reply
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Esquivaliencet 02:41, 12 May 2015 (UTC)reply
Keep, barely. Right now she's one of GMA Network's bigger artists (which isn't saying much: GMA Network has been struggling in recent years, and generally the fame of their artists is a lot less than those of its main rival ABS-CBN; the only reason I know Garcia is because I do research on that network), and it shows through
this search which shows coverage from independent sources such as the Philippine Daily Inquirer. She's also been the lead or otherwise had a major role in several GMA shows, which would also be enough to establish notability. She's only 16? Younger than me? Wow.
Narutolovehinata5tccsdnew 23:15, 12 May 2015 (UTC)reply
Let the Love Begin (TV series), of which she's the lead actress, is now airing on its 1st week, so this certainly puts her over the threshold, even though, let's say all of the references are associated with GMA. –HTD 20:02, 16 May 2015 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. After three relists I can't see any consensus here on whether the notability guidelines are met.
Davewild (
talk) 07:17, 19 May 2015 (UTC)reply
BLP that has been around for 3 months with no substantive refs. Fails all relevant notability criteria VelellaVelella Talk 22:01, 19 April 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete - Not sure why I !voted Keep and not really sure how I came to post those sources as they're piss poor!, I can't find anything to suggest notability, Sure she's been in a few movies but it's the notability we're judging here not how many movies she's in/been in. –
Davey2010Talk 20:44, 28 April 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete The one reference on this article is a blog post on an individual's blog, so it really should be removed. The gmanetwork links appear to be promotional by the TV company. The Manila Standard articles contain mentions in their entertainment pages, but at least one didn't name her at all.
LaMona (
talk) 22:51, 25 April 2015 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, §
FreeRangeFrogcroak 21:16, 26 April 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete with no prejudice for recreating if and when she achieves greater recognition.
Renata (
talk) 21:23, 26 April 2015 (UTC)reply
Keep. Currently has a major role in
InstaDad and presumably in Let the Love Begin (not the one linked above as that was a movie), passing the threshold for
WP:NACTOR #1: "Has had significant roles in multiple... television shows." –HTD 16:21, 27 April 2015 (UTC)reply
Weak keep per reasoning given by
Howard the Duck, subject clearly passes criteria #1 of
WP:NACTOR. However, if NACTOR was not a notability guideline, it would be a tough sell IMHO. The subject has received
significant coverage in multiple reliable sources, but those sources are primarily GMA News and Philippine Entertainment Portal ( a joint venture between GMA &
Summit Media), both with connections to the media company which airs the shows which the subject of this AfD stars in. Therefore, it could be argued that those sources are not
independent sources. Either way, cannot support deletion due to NACTOR, and
deletion is not a substitution for article improvement.--
RightCowLeftCoast (
talk) 02:02, 30 April 2015 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 10:48, 5 May 2015 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached. Relisting comment: Final relist. Esquivaliencet 02:41, 12 May 2015 (UTC)reply
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Esquivaliencet 02:41, 12 May 2015 (UTC)reply
Keep, barely. Right now she's one of GMA Network's bigger artists (which isn't saying much: GMA Network has been struggling in recent years, and generally the fame of their artists is a lot less than those of its main rival ABS-CBN; the only reason I know Garcia is because I do research on that network), and it shows through
this search which shows coverage from independent sources such as the Philippine Daily Inquirer. She's also been the lead or otherwise had a major role in several GMA shows, which would also be enough to establish notability. She's only 16? Younger than me? Wow.
Narutolovehinata5tccsdnew 23:15, 12 May 2015 (UTC)reply
Let the Love Begin (TV series), of which she's the lead actress, is now airing on its 1st week, so this certainly puts her over the threshold, even though, let's say all of the references are associated with GMA. –HTD 20:02, 16 May 2015 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.