The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete.
ɑʀкʏɑɴ 16:44, 6 September 2007 (UTC)reply
Delete for lack of assertion of notability. Even though the theory of
luminiferous aether held up
so well to experimental verification, I doubt this new version will catch on.
Someguy1221 05:51, 3 September 2007 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete.
ɑʀкʏɑɴ 16:44, 6 September 2007 (UTC)reply
Delete for lack of assertion of notability. Even though the theory of
luminiferous aether held up
so well to experimental verification, I doubt this new version will catch on.
Someguy1221 05:51, 3 September 2007 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.